← Teams

THPRD-Waters

2022 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.64 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Doug Matheson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
—
Patrick Harkin
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.35
Steven Keo
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
—
Dean Waters
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
—
Matt Bolte
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.25
Michael Jansen
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.25
Murray Jansen
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2022-03-26Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesBoon Yon Joung / Doug Matheson vs Heidi Wilcox / Vincent Lee6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2021-11-20Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesMurray Jansen / Doug Matheson vs Donald Pettitt / Eric Cooley6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesChuck Yett / Steven Keo vs Floyd Grant / Peter Monsantofils2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPaul Stutzman / Matt Bolte vs Gary Willihnganz / Jeffrey Gates6-3, 6-3
2021-11-14Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesDoug Matheson / Matt Bolte vs Carlin Jackson / Kevin Oloughlin6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMurray Jansen / Michael Jansen vs Ken Crowley / Steve Carns6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesChuck Yett / Dean Waters vs Anthony Valenzuela / Paul Garry6-3, 6-1
2021-10-30Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesDoug Matheson / Steven Keo vs Robert Ferek / Dave Vinik0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMurray Jansen / Michael Jansen vs Jim Wheeler / Kelly Small6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesChuck Yett / Patrick Harkin vs David Carlson / Scott Anderson6-3, 6-3
2021-10-10Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesDoug Matheson / Murray Jansen vs David Vant Hof / David Dowler6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPatrick Harkin / Dean Waters vs Steve Eggerts / Ken Nichols6-1, 6-2
2021-10-08Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesMurray Jansen / Michael Jansen vs Jonathan Barg / Todd Eckelman6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDoug Matheson / Matt Bolte vs Donald Brenneman / Jeffrey Krum6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChuck Yett / Dean Waters vs William Campbell / Rudy Martinez6-2, 6-4
2021-09-25Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesDean Waters / Doug Matheson vs William Anderson / Neal Burgstahler6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesPatrick Harkin / Chuck Yett vs Clark Cosart / Mark Stephenson6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMurray Jansen / Michael Jansen vs Jonathan Caplan / Ken Ackerman6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2021-09-11Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesSteven Keo / Doug Matheson vs Neil Soiffer / Tony Moreno6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesPatrick Harkin / Paul Stutzman vs Michael Kazangian / JT Smith6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMurray Jansen / Michael Jansen vs Jim Hopkins / Dean Gaylor4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Doug Matheson
20W–40L career
not enough data
—
4
Patrick Harkin
88W–69L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Steven Keo
45W–44L career
0%97%3%
3.35
3.5
Dean Waters
30W–42L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Matt Bolte
74W–78L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Michael Jansen
27W–55L career
2%97%1%
3.25
3.5
Murray Jansen
38W–63L career
1%98%1%
3.25

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.