Teams

CC SLOCC Ricci

2026 USTA CC Winter Mixed Doubles 18 & OVER · CC USTA MXD 7.0 18 & OVER

18 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-02-28vs CC - LLW - SMCC CabilesLost 02
L#1 DoublesSean Newsom / Edith Martin vs Matthew Hiltner / Audrey Weil1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesErik Ramberg / Amy Stets vs Heather Harper / Thomas Gonzales3-6, 1-6
2026-01-17vs CC - LLW - SMCC CabilesLost 03
L#1 DoublesJean Kennedy / Michael Reburn vs Derek Glas / Samantha Stollberg3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAmy Stets / Justin Wellner vs Audrey Weil / Steven Baird0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesHanna Smith / David Smith vs Lorena Torres / Jason Reinwald3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CC USTA MXD 7.0 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Dagne Ricci
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.89
Hanna Smith
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Abrianna Rose
published 3.5
3.51
Stephanie Ventura
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.47
Rose Ancheta
published
3.44
Camila Strong
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.38
Edith Martin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Masha Schroeder
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.35
John Strong
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.34
Justin Wellner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Michael Reburn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Amy Stets
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Michael Leeder
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Jonathan Fu
published
3.06
Sean Newsom
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.00
Valerie Fu
published
2.88
Erik Ramberg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Joel Gutierrez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Camila Strong + John Strong5058% gamesnot enough data
Dagne Ricci + John Strong314 matchesnot enough data
Amy Stets + Justin Wellner123 matchesnot enough data
Jonathan Fu + Valerie Fu123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dagne Ricci
7W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
4.13
Hanna Smith
32W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.89
3.5
Abrianna Rose
48W–12L career · no lines in 2026
<1%5%95%
3.73
Stephanie Ventura
30W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.51
Rose Ancheta
20W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Camila Strong
42W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.44
Edith Martin
17W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.38
Masha Schroeder
12W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.37
John Strong
17W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35
Justin Wellner
8W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
Michael Reburn
5W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Amy Stets
16W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15
Michael Leeder
8W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.13
Jonathan Fu
3W–6L career · no lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10
Sean Newsom
4W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.06
Valerie Fu
5W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.00
Erik Ramberg
0W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
80%20%<1%
2.88
Joel Gutierrez
5W–17L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.