Teams

Jacaranda Double Trouble

2021 Sarasota Adult 40 & Over Weekend · 4.0 W Saturday

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-06-19vs River Strand BarnardWon 10
W#1 DoublesConstance Duncan / Petra Klos vs Nancy Finman / Lorraine Breidenstein6-1, 7-5
2021-06-13vs LWR 40 LoveWon 20
W#1 DoublesSueAnn Sanders / Yvonne Ghilardi vs Abigail Stephens / Barbara Moore7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesConstance Duncan / Deanna Allard vs Andrea Deitch / Betty Jo Zeigler6-4, 6-2
2021-06-05Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDeanna Allard / Petra Klos vs Ann Lammers / Heidi Grimes6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2021-05-22Won 10
W#3 DoublesAnnthonia Prossi / SueAnn Sanders vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#1 DoublesHao Li Ee / SueAnn Sanders vs Jennifer Godfrey / Heidi Grimes1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesConstance Duncan / Petra Klos vs Ann Lammers / Sue Green4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2021-04-24vs LWR 40 LoveSplit 11
L#1 SinglesDeanna Allard vs Marina Cameron6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSueAnn Sanders / Annthonia Prossi vs Patricia Duxbury / Betty Jo Zeigler6-2, 6-3
2021-04-10vs River Strand BarnardLost 12
L#1 DoublesYvonne Ghilardi / SueAnn Sanders vs Kara Beene / Teri Barnard0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesConstance Duncan / Petra Klos vs Nancy Finman / Judi Wilson6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDeanna Allard / Kanjana Thomas vs Hattie Grimsley / Sharyn Quiros6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2021-04-03vs GT Bray Babes Who HustleWon 30
W#1 DoublesSueAnn Sanders / Yvonne Ghilardi vs Monica Darold / Elsa Trefil6-4, 6-0
W#1 SinglesDeanna Allard vs Margaret Kirkland7-5, 7-5
W#3 DoublesConstance Duncan / Petra Klos vs Susie DuDeVoire / Barbara Mire4-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Constance Duncan
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.67
Marsha Timm
published
3.63
Deanna Allard
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
Lynn Inganamort
published
Petra Klos
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
SueAnn Sanders
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deanna Allard + Constance Duncan291757% games+0.2% vs expected
Petra Klos + Constance Duncan3449% gamesnot enough data
Constance Duncan + SueAnn Sanders3354% gamesnot enough data
Petra Klos + Deanna Allard044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Constance Duncan
148W–117L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.79
Marsha Timm
8W–14L career · no lines in 2021
10%89%<1%
3.67
4
Deanna Allard
122W–106L career · 5 lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
3.63
Lynn Inganamort
4W–9L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Petra Klos
23W–31L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
SueAnn Sanders
181W–114L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.