Teams

Sanidas

2024 Frederick Adult 18 & Over · Frederick Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.31 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-06-09vs ChaLost 01
L#3 DoublesKHOURY ZIAD / Michael Erdely vs Joshua Zoltek / Hung Nguyen3-6, 2-6
2024-06-08vs ChaWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlexander Gerson / Alex Dowidchuk vs Ahmed Al Aebeda / Bradley Schug6-3, 6-1
2024-06-06vs ChaLost 03
L#1 DoublesLukas Sanidas / Steve French vs Bradley Schug / Robert Kargus6-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesAlexander Gerson / Alex Dowidchuk vs Jeffrey Fowle / Luis Lozano2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesEmad Nekoo / KHOURY ZIAD vs Joshua Zoltek / Juan Jose Tijero4-6, 3-6
2024-06-05vs ChaWon 20
W#2 DoublesLukas Sanidas / Steve French vs Hung Nguyen / Derek Ireland4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichael Erdely / KHOURY ZIAD vs Eduardo Munoz Corona / Juan Jose Tijero6-2, 6-4
2024-06-03vs ChaLost 01
L#2 DoublesBradley Jacques / Emad Nekoo vs Eduardo Munoz Corona / Joshua Zoltek2-6, 1-6
2024-06-01vs ChaWon 30
W#1 DoublesLukas Sanidas / NEERAV GANJOO vs Jeffrey Fowle / Luis Lozano4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAlexander Gerson / Alex Dowidchuk vs Ahmed Al Aebeda / Joshua Zoltek6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBradley Jacques / Emad Nekoo vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Frederick Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.06 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.52
NEERAV GANJOO
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.31
Steve French
published
4.24
Barry Weiner
published 4.5
4.13
Lukas Sanidas
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.09
Alex Dowidchuk
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.99
KHOURY ZIAD
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.91
Alexander Gerson
published 4
3.72
Michael Erdely
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Bradley Jacques
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bradley Jacques + Alexander Gerson1437% games−4.7% vs expected
Michael Erdely + Bradley Jacques3540% gamesnot enough data
NEERAV GANJOO + Lukas Sanidas404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
NEERAV GANJOO
81W–15L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%44%56%
4.52
Steve French
10W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
4.31
4.5
Barry Weiner
12W–7L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
4.24
4.5
Lukas Sanidas
142W–110L career · 3 lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
4.13
4.5
Alex Dowidchuk
21W–32L career · 3 lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
4.09
4.5
KHOURY ZIAD
238W–194L career · 3 lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
3.99
4
Alexander Gerson
24W–21L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%26%
3.91
4
Michael Erdely
206W–159L career · 2 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Bradley Jacques
192W–206L career · 2 lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.