Teams

FREMONT TC CW6.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 6.5

20 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-11-01vs BAY CLUB PL CW6.5BLost 02
L#1 DoublesStanimira Ivanova Neykova Kendeva / Kathy Mertens vs Caimei Lei / Weiwei Luan3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCinyi Mao / Aditi Sinha vs Tina Zhao / Lihong Chao6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2025-10-29vs CASTLEWOOD CC CW6.5ALost 12
L#1 DoublesDorita Castillano / You Li vs Lorna Smith / Stella Liu4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesChristine Start / Stanimira Ivanova Neykova Kendeva vs Kathy D'Onofrio / Donna Templeman6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSwina Sapkota / Jing Zhao vs Diane Chinn / Christina Grimes6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Yemia Hashimoto
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.56
Mhavz Malado
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.41
Stanimira Ivanova Neykova Kendeva
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Dorita Castillano
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.34
Aditi Sinha
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Cinyi Mao
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Julieta Leong
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.26
Christine Start
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Ellen Xiao
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Shiyi H.
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.20
Kathy Mertens
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.19
Swina Sapkota
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
You Li
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Melissa Sano
published
3.02
Jing Zhao
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Mengjiao Zhang
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.95
Melanie Cazenas
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.89
Xiaocen Shan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Qin Zeng
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Xiaoyi Shi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mhavz Malado + Dorita Castillano314 matchesnot enough data
Stanimira Ivanova Neykova Kendeva + Christine Start303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Yemia Hashimoto
35W–35L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.58
Mhavz Malado
36W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.56
Stanimira Ivanova Neykova Kendeva
19W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Dorita Castillano
27W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Aditi Sinha
11W–2L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Cinyi Mao
20W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%5%
3.28
Julieta Leong
8W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.28
3
Christine Start
23W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.26
3.5
Ellen Xiao
4W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shiyi H.
6W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.21
Kathy Mertens
5W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
Swina Sapkota
20W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
You Li
10W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.07
Melissa Sano
7W–18L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.02
Jing Zhao
13W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.02
Mengjiao Zhang
20W–10L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.01
Melanie Cazenas
10W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
Xiaocen Shan
15W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
Qin Zeng
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%5%
2.78
Xiaoyi Shi
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.