Teams

Yadkin/Ferrell-White/18+ 3.5 Singles

2026 Yadkin Valley Singles 18 & Over · Women 3.5 - Monday Evening

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-03Won 10
W#2 SinglesHannah Giles vs Ashley Peters6-4, 6-2
2026-07-23vs Yadkin/Morgan/18+3.5Won 21
L#1 SinglesLauren Timcheck vs Sarah Gabriel0-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesBetsy Harris vs Natalie Fishman6-1, 1-1
W#3 SinglesHannah Giles vs Ashley Peters6-1, 6-3
2026-07-01vs Yadkin/Morgan/18+3.5Lost 02
L#2 SinglesLindsay Reynolds vs Sarah Gabriel1-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesNora Ferrell vs Adele Roberts3-6, 1-6
2026-06-29vs Yadkin/Morgan/18+3.5Split 11
W#1 SinglesHannah Giles vs Katherine Heath7-6, 6-3
L#2 SinglesBetsy Harris vs Lauren Hylarides2-6, 1-6
2026-06-15vs Yadkin/Morgan/18+3.5Won 21
W#1 SinglesHannah Giles vs Katherine Heath5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 SinglesNora Ferrell vs Emily Mustin6-0, 6-2
L#3 SinglesBetsy Harris vs Ashley Peters4-6, 3-6
2026-06-08vs Yadkin/Morgan/18+3.5Split 11
W#2 SinglesRebecca Hartsough vs Emily Mustin6-0, 6-0
L#3 SinglesNancy Hart vs Lauren Hylarides2-6, 3-6
2026-06-01vs Yadkin/Morgan/18+3.5Lost 12
L#1 SinglesLindsay Reynolds vs Lauren Hylarides2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesNora Ferrell vs Natalie Fishman4-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesBetsy Harris vs Adele Roberts3-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 3.5 - Monday Evening
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Yadkin/Morgan/18+3.553141020164
2Yadkin/Ferrell-White/18+ 3.5 Singles3591533235

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Hannah Giles
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.43
Lindsay Reynolds
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.35
JoAnn White
published
3.34
Lauren Timcheck
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.32
Rebecca Hartsough
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.22
Betsy Harris
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3
3.21
Nancy Hart
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.19
Nora Ferrell
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Hartsough + Lauren Timcheck123 matchesnot enough data
JoAnn White + Hannah Giles303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Hannah Giles
38W–3L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
<1%9%91%
3.67
Lindsay Reynolds
26W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.43
JoAnn White
39W–23L career · no lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.35
Lauren Timcheck
29W–28L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.34
Rebecca Hartsough
40W–35L career · 1 line in 2026
1%91%9%
3.32
3
Betsy Harris
38W–19L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%5%95%
3.22
Nancy Hart
34W–32L career · 1 line in 2026
5%94%1%
3.21
Nora Ferrell
21W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.