Teams

KY/LEX/Ernst

2023 USTA TRI-LEVEL 18 & OVER LEXINGTON · 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.62 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Katie Parrish
published
3.84
Camille Morrow
published 4
3.46
Kavonne B. Webb
published
3.42
Jennifer Janes
published
3.35
Brooke Marnitz
published 3.5
3.35
Laura Kennoy
published
3.32
Cynthia Yeiser
published 3.5
3.29
Allyssa Kilanowski
published 3.5
3.05
Samantha Swentzel
published
Michelle Kline
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Kennoy + Brooke Marnitz14657% games+8.2% vs expected
Katie Parrish + Camille Morrow22567% games+5.7% vs expected
Allyssa Kilanowski + Laura Kennoy123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Parrish
56W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Camille Morrow
54W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
3.84
Kavonne B. Webb
57W–38L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.46
Jennifer Janes
12W–20L career · no lines in 2023
74%26%<1%
3.42
3.5
Brooke Marnitz
51W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%13%
3.35
Laura Kennoy
43W–48L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Cynthia Yeiser
29W–20L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Allyssa Kilanowski
26W–52L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.29
Samantha Swentzel
7W–19L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.05
Michelle Kline
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.