Teams

Greenhill/Savelli-Curtis W3.0F

2026 DALLAS TENNIS N · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Friday

17 players · average NTRP 2.88 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-17vs Lakewood/Dorff-Harrison W3.0FWon 10
W#3 DoublesAnnie Friedman / Cynthia Savelli vs Mindy Jacobe / Julianne Srinivasan6-2, 6-4
2025-10-10vs Northwood/Shaw-Smith W3.0FLost 01
L#3 DoublesAnnie Friedman / Anna Meitzen vs Sallie Behnke / Kate Busch4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMahsa Firoozi / Karen Foust vs Christy Key / Susan Falbo1-6, 1-6
2025-09-26vs Fretz/Reist-Dillon W3.0FWon 10
W#3 DoublesLorri Brehm / Stephanie Toups vs Jeana Harbour / Meredith Salge7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2025-09-12vs Brookhaven/Younts-Dorsey W3.0FWon 10
W#3 DoublesTiffany Chen / Leslie Watkins vs Molly Dorsey / Corey Edwards4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAnnie Friedman vs Thu Haire0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesLorri Brehm / Dawn Johnson vs Stephanie Merrifield / Kerrin Nally6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Friday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Cindy Chiou
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Margrit Bazan
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.08
Donna Wolf
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3
3.01
Gerilynn Sanders
usually #1 Doubles 92%, also #3 Doubles 8% · published 3
2.99
Cynthia Savelli
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.80
Janel Chu
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.76
Darci Sachdeva
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.73
Alexis Cass
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 14% · published 2.5
2.71
Lorri Brehm
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.70
Anna Meitzen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.69
Samantha Curtis
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.62
Stephanie Toups
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
2.56
Karen Foust
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.41
Annie Friedman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.35
Mahsa Firoozi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lauren Kampa
published
Leslie Watkins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Darci Sachdeva + Cynthia Savelli5260% games+8.0% vs expected
Alexis Cass + Anna Meitzen6362% games+5.2% vs expected
Gerilynn Sanders + Donna Wolf12557% games+4.9% vs expected
Gerilynn Sanders + Cynthia Savelli101253% games+0.2% vs expected
Anna Meitzen + Samantha Curtis5260% games−1.0% vs expected
Gerilynn Sanders + Margrit Bazan3254% gamesnot enough data
Donna Wolf + Cynthia Savelli2351% gamesnot enough data
Gerilynn Sanders + Darci Sachdeva404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cindy Chiou
14W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
13%86%<1%
3.15
Margrit Bazan
39W–22L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%18%82%
3.12
3
Donna Wolf
48W–34L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.08
3
Gerilynn Sanders
63W–62L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.01
3
Cynthia Savelli
36W–30L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
2.99
Janel Chu
12W–14L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Darci Sachdeva
20W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
2.76
2.5
Alexis Cass
21W–20L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%4%96%
2.73
Lorri Brehm
5W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
2.71
2.5
Anna Meitzen
21W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
0%7%93%
2.70
Samantha Curtis
22W–17L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%8%92%
2.69
Stephanie Toups
19W–7L career · 7 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
2.62
Karen Foust
18W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%31%69%
2.56
2.5
Annie Friedman
14W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%75%25%
2.41
Mahsa Firoozi
5W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
0%88%12%
2.35
Lauren Kampa
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Leslie Watkins
12W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.