Teams

BAM - Vineyards - Kronen

2022 Collier Adult 55 & Over Fall · Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-12-09vs Sterling Oaks - GouldSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSusie Beaudet / Marie Zinno vs Amy McHale / Lani Wheeler7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesGay Kronen / Susan Phelps vs Elisabeth Beck / Deborah Norton6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L#1 DoublesKim Swope Schott / Gay Kronen vs Megan Losier / Holly MacInnes1-6, 3-6
2021-11-23vs Pelican Bay North - J. HowardLost 01
L#2 DoublesChristine Kriss / Marie Zinno vs Laura Groark / Judy Howell6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2021-11-11vs Marco YMCA - K. LewisSplit 11
W#2 DoublesKim Swope Schott / Marie Zinno vs Peggy Chandler / Jodi Schaufus7-5, 7-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Phelps / Gay Kronen vs Gloria Anderson / Jean Martin6-7, 5-7
2021-11-04vs Players Club - M. LeonardWon 10
W#3 DoublesMarie Zinno / Susan Phelps vs Claire Morris / Ann McDonald6-4, 6-2
2021-10-28vs Fiddlers Creek - FioreWon 20
W#2 DoublesKim Swope Schott / Marie Zinno vs Dawn Cooper / Barbara Slifkin6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesGay Kronen / Susan Phelps vs Laura Fischer / Diane Herman7-5, 6-0
2021-10-21vs Village Walk Bonita - S. GreekLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusie Beaudet / Kim Swope Schott vs Margaret Laggis / Janet Homburg6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2021-10-14vs Cambier - TrombleyWon 10
W#2 DoublesChristine Kriss / Marie Zinno vs Joyce Perry / Toni Trombley6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Christine Kriss
published 4
3.43
Marie Zinno
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.35
Susie Beaudet
published
3.06
Kim Swope Schott
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.91
Rhonda Kelly
published
Lynda Guba
published
Mary McIntire
published
Susan Phelps
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Phelps + Marie Zinno12263% gamesnot enough data
Kim Swope Schott + Marie Zinno6648% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christine Kriss
10W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
Marie Zinno
66W–37L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
3.43
Susie Beaudet
19W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
3.35
Kim Swope Schott
23W–28L career · 4 lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.06
Rhonda Kelly
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%23%
2.91
Lynda Guba
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary McIntire
16W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Phelps
119W–117L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.