Teams

MHanauer-ENO

2025 Eno River Tri-Level-18 & Over · 18 & Over 5.0

13 players · average NTRP 4.39 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-24vs RBerliner-ENOLost 03
L#1 DoublesAndres Carro / Jason Hull vs Phillip Cardella / Nicholas Camilleri6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMatthew Hanauer / Spencer Llewellyn vs John Hankinson / Caleb Richmond2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesStewart Bible / Michael Weslander vs Mark Scherr / Aubry Carmody6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-07-17vs RBerliner-ENOSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAndres Carro / Jason Hull vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesMichael Weslander / Joshua Ganeles vs Aubry Carmody / Mark Scherr4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-07-10vs RBerliner-ENOWon 10
W#2 DoublesSpencer Llewellyn / Zack Czajkowski vs Jackson Naftel / Caleb Richmond6-4, 6-4
2025-06-26vs RBerliner-ENOSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAndres Carro / Matthew Hanauer vs Herman Naftel / Phillip Cardella1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSpencer Llewellyn / William Gray vs John Hankinson / Parv Mital2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-06-19vs RBerliner-ENOWon 10
W#1 DoublesAndres Carro / Connor Wilkins vs Herman Naftel / Phillip Cardella7-5, 6-4
2025-06-12vs RBerliner-ENOLost 02
L#2 DoublesZack Czajkowski / Spencer Llewellyn vs Rawle Sue-Ho / William Martin4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesStewart Bible / Michael Weslander vs Visakan Jayakumar / Caleb Richmond4-6, 5-7
2025-06-05vs RBerliner-ENOLost 01
L#1 DoublesAndres Carro / Connor Wilkins vs Nicholas Camilleri / Phillip Cardella4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 5.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.21 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.88
Andres Carro
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.63
Connor Wilkins
published 5
4.42
Jason Hull
published
4.36
Zack Czajkowski
published
4.32
Kevin Huang
published
4.27
Spencer Llewellyn
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.18
Matthew Hanauer
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 4.5
4.11
Stewart Bible
published
4.06
Michael Weslander
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.93
Jeron Russell
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.89
Nick Gilder
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.87
Jackson Cabell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.83
Joshua Ganeles
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Spencer Llewellyn + Matthew Hanauer9556% games+6.8% vs expected
Jeron Russell + Jackson Cabell161849% games+4.7% vs expected
Jeron Russell + Nick Gilder6948% games+1.7% vs expected
Nick Gilder + Matthew Hanauer5265% gamesnot enough data
Spencer Llewellyn + Michael Weslander3358% gamesnot enough data
Jeron Russell + Michael Weslander224 matchesnot enough data
Michael Weslander + Stewart Bible314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Andres Carro
90W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.88
5
Connor Wilkins
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.63
Jason Hull
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.42
Zack Czajkowski
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%15%
4.36
Kevin Huang
18W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
4.32
4.5
Spencer Llewellyn
230W–157L career · 8 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
4.27
4.5
Matthew Hanauer
162W–105L career · 9 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
4.18
Stewart Bible
15W–28L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
4.11
4
Michael Weslander
214W–93L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
4.06
4
Jeron Russell
142W–90L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.93
4
Nick Gilder
111W–89L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.89
4.5
Jackson Cabell
44W–62L career · 3 lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
3.87
4
Joshua Ganeles
65W–123L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.