Teams

Super Tennis Chicks 3.0 18+

2021 Howard-Columbia Adult 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over Women 3.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.08 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2021-06-15vs You had me at Tennis 3.0 18+Lost 02
L#1 DoublesToni Vanderputten / Betty Wang vs Angela Helder / Beth Berry4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesChanhee Ro / Margaret Sybert vs Debbie Wall / Elvira McCullough3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2021-06-10vs Shepard's Flock 3.0 18+Split 11
W#2 DoublesToni Vanderputten / Maryanne Gruys vs Leslie MacFarlane / Melanie Yaksich6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesChanhee Ro / Gabbe Cadoux vs Na Yi / Katie Tetrault1-6, 5-7
2021-06-08vs No Donuts 3.0 18+Won 20
W#1 DoublesMihaela Pertea / Anna Kuligowski vs Grace Gourdine / Deanna Gourdine6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAmy Lamont / Chanhee Ro vs Terri Windsor / Danyelle Taylor6-3, 6-2
2021-05-27vs Rally Girls 3.0 18+Won 10
W#1 DoublesAnna Kuligowski / Betty Wang vs Donna Jones / Kathy Greene7-6, 6-4
2021-05-21vs Squirrels in Traffic 3.0 18+Won 10
W#2 DoublesToni Vanderputten / Maryanne Gruys vs Rosemary Harty / Beverly Graham7-6, 5-1
2021-05-14vs More LoveSplit 11
W#2 DoublesToni Vanderputten / Amy Lamont vs Elizabeth Hok / Nancy Brown1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChanhee Ro / Gabbe Cadoux vs Colleen D'Agrosa / Cheryl Royce6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2021-05-11vs Shepard's Flock 3.0 18+Won 30
W#1 SinglesAnna Kuligowski vs Amy LaMoure6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMihaela Pertea / Elizabeth Hatton vs Leslie MacFarlane / Pamela Mary Gogol6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesChanhee Ro / Margaret Sybert vs Bernadette Burger / Melanie Yaksich6-4, 6-4
2021-04-28vs No Donuts 3.0 18+Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMihaela Pertea / Maryanne Gruys vs Cynthia Rapp / Alecia Brinkley3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesAnna Kuligowski vs Jessica Dixon Laukzemis6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesToni Vanderputten / Gabbe Cadoux vs Valerie Pierce / Andaiye Hamilton2-6, 2-6
2021-04-19vs You had me at Tennis 3.0 18+Won 20
W#1 SinglesAnna Kuligowski vs Beth Berry6-2, 5-7
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Hatton / Toni Vanderputten vs Lynn Barber / Kristin Ostlie6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2021-04-18vs More LoveLost 12
W#1 DoublesMaryanne Gruys / Mihaela Pertea vs Julie Cabaniss / Erica Steadman6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesChanhee Ro / Thu Pham vs Mandi Santanello / Gina Seyfried1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesClaudia Silberglitt / Susan Flaherty vs Kimberly LaRose / Wendye Appel2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-04-17vs Squirrels in Traffic 3.0 18+Won 21
L#1 DoublesMihaela Pertea / Maryanne Gruys vs Renee Plazak / Christy Hull2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAnna Kuligowski vs Sung Cho6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAmy Lamont / Claudia Silberglitt vs Shari Albert / Sejal Jani6-2, 6-4
2021-04-08vs Rally Girls 3.0 18+Won 21
W#1 DoublesMihaela Pertea / Maryanne Gruys vs Kathy Greene / STACEY WOLFE2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChanhee Ro / Betty Wang vs Brenda Poore / Ugur Erickson6-1, 6-4
L#2 SinglesToni Vanderputten vs Irene Lemberos6-7, 3-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
3.12
Anna Kuligowski
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.94
Susan Flaherty
published
2.84
Kevin Ro
published
2.81
Claudia Silberglitt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.77
Mihaela Pertea
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 46% · published 3
Amy Lamont
published 3
2.72
Toni Vanderputten
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.61
Chanhee Ro
usually #3 Doubles 73%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 3
Thu Pham
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Toni Vanderputten + Chanhee Ro6944% games+3.5% vs expected
Toni Vanderputten + Mihaela Pertea224 matchesnot enough data
Mihaela Pertea + Chanhee Ro224 matchesnot enough data
Mihaela Pertea + Anna Kuligowski303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Victoria VanderPutten
10W–12L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Anna Kuligowski
39W–53L career · 6 lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
3.12
Susan Flaherty
2W–11L career · no lines in 2021
67%33%<1%
2.94
Kevin Ro
18W–15L career · no lines in 2021
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Claudia Silberglitt
98W–73L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Mihaela Pertea
161W–149L career · 11 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Amy Lamont
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Toni Vanderputten
97W–155L career · 15 lines in 2021
5%94%1%
2.72
3
Chanhee Ro
117W–136L career · 11 lines in 2021
19%81%<1%
2.61
Thu Pham
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.