Teams

GS - Leeder

2026 GS USTA Combo 40 & Over League · 5.5 Adult Women

6 players · average NTRP 2.50 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-05vs OB - GrayWon 21
L#1 DoublesAdrienne Brown / Donna Holderfield vs Debby Gray / Stacy Gober4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSandra Rogers / Robin Nunley vs Melissa Miller / Sarita Tanner3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBecky Kennedy / Michelle Connors vs Cheryl Bollinger / Lisa Littrell7-6, 6-4
2026-07-29vs OB - GrayWon 21
L#1 DoublesSandra Rogers / Jamie Wood vs Melissa Miller / Sarita Tanner6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAdrienne Brown / Robin Nunley vs Lisa Littrell / Cheryl Bollinger6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDana Hawley / Michelle Connors vs Marilyn Breyel / Charlene Doody7-5, 6-3
2026-07-15vs OB - GrayWon 21
W#1 DoublesAdrienne Brown / Jamie Wood vs Cheryl Bollinger / Lisa Littrell7-5, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMichelle Connors / Sandra Rogers vs Marilyn Breyel / Sarita Tanner4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBecky Kennedy / Robin Nunley vs Debby Gray / Lauren Weaver6-1, 6-2
2026-07-08vs OB - GrayWon 21
L#1 DoublesBecky Kennedy / Robin Nunley vs Lisa Littrell / Cheryl Bollinger3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJamie Wood / Adrienne Brown vs Melissa Miller / Sarita Tanner6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesSandra Rogers / Donna Holderfield vs Debby Gray / Lauren Weaver6-1, 6-4
2026-07-01vs OB - GrayWon 30
W#1 DoublesDana Hawley / Jamie Wood vs Melissa Miller / Cheryl Bollinger7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAdrienne Brown / Michelle Connors vs Debby Gray / Lauren Weaver6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSandra Rogers / Robin Nunley vs Marilyn Breyel / Stacy Gober7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 5.5 Adult Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GS - Leeder501149110

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Jamie Wood
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.87
Michelle Connors
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.58
Robin Nunley
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.33
Sandra Rogers
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.31
Dana Hawley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Donna Holderfield
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jamie Wood
15W–19L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
Michelle Connors
5W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
83%17%<1%
2.87
Robin Nunley
8W–8L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%28%72%
2.58
Sandra Rogers
5W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%89%11%
2.33
2.5
Dana Hawley
3W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.31
Donna Holderfield
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.