Teams

BC-WestEnd/TakakoTary3.5

2026 SoCal Doubles - Beach Cities · BC Women - 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.42 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings15 teams · BC Women - 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BC-WestEnd/BrendaKodani3.5000000
2BC-MiraCosta/ElizabethPark3.5000000
3BC-AltaVista/KarieLanterman3.5000000
4BC-SouthEnd/KathyKim3.5000000
5BC-BillieJeanKing/BeejellSoco3.5000000
6BC-PVTC/TriciaRapaport3.5000000
7BC-MCC/AmySchmargen3.5000000
8BC-MCC/KristieSherrill3.5000000
9BC-ElSegundo/SusanMoreno3.5000000
10BC-MiraCosta/AnneDeMartini3.5000000
11BC-AltaVista/SondeeWolff3.5000000
12BC-Kramer/ColleenPost3.5000000
13BC-MCC/LesleyLyon3.5000000
14BC-Peninsula/PattiYork3.5000000
15BC-WestEnd/TakakoTary3.5000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Kathy Valdesuso
published
3.41
Angela Landoch
published 3.5
3.20
Colleen Johnson
published 3.5
3.18
Susan Dalton
published
3.16
Cheryl Williams
published 3.5
3.10
Julie Mazor
published
3.04
Barbara Hemmerich
published 3.5
3.04
Theresa Riley
published 3.5
3.03
Huong Mary Lai
published
3.01
Marie Bald
published
2.97
Serena Jaklich
published
2.94
Joyce Flood
published
2.87
Lisa Drexinger
published 3
2.84
Takako Tary
published
2.83
Kyoko Yamada
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Takako Tary + Kyoko Yamada4649% games+2.5% vs expected
Cheryl Williams + Barbara Hemmerich6748% games+1.7% vs expected
Angela Landoch + Theresa Riley4651% games−0.1% vs expected
Barbara Hemmerich + Theresa Riley123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathy Valdesuso
11W–17L career · no lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.54
3.5
Angela Landoch
3W–10L career · type S · no lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.41
3.5
Colleen Johnson
3W–17L career · no lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.20
Susan Dalton
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Cheryl Williams
85W–155L career · no lines in 2026
13%87%1%
3.16
Julie Mazor
9W–5L career · no lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Barbara Hemmerich
79W–90L career · no lines in 2026
38%61%<1%
3.04
3.5
Theresa Riley
64W–66L career · no lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.04
Huong Mary Lai
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.03
Marie Bald
1W–11L career · no lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
3.01
Serena Jaklich
14W–17L career · no lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
Joyce Flood
3W–12L career · no lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
2.94
3
Lisa Drexinger
122W–172L career · no lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
Takako Tary
13W–18L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.84
Kyoko Yamada
9W–18L career · no lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.