Teams

NITA S 30W18d Rush Copley-Dantzer/Tomazic

2024 NITA3 Summer Adult 18 & Over · NITA Summer Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NORTHERN ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-14Won 20
W#1 DoublesSharon Jerndt / Maureen Knox vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAmelia Dantzer / Julene Freund vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-06-27vs NITA S 30W18a Five Star-SchwandtLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichelle Sungren / Sharon Jerndt vs Liz Schwandt / Danielle Shannon3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesLisa Mastin vs Lauren Cangilla1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJulene Freund / Amelia Dantzer vs Bethany Young / Jennifer Kot4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 DoublesTeri-Lynn Tomazic / Emily Duerr vs Megan Engstrom / Brianna Keane7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAlba Lane vs Yan Lee0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAmelia Dantzer / Lisa Mastin vs Loreal Leonard / Kristin Eccles6-7, 5-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJulie Blocker / Julene Freund vs Linda Blomquist / Suzanne Fallon3-6, 0-6
2024-06-06vs NITA S 30w18b Oak Brook-SavanelliLost 03
L#1 DoublesTeri-Lynn Tomazic / Lisa Mastin vs Kolleen Mooren / JennI Stull3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJanet Miller / Amelia Dantzer vs Tiffany Michalak / Meghan Hood4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMichelle Sungren / Maro Gessell vs Aletta Dornhof / Avon Lok7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2024-06-02vs NITA S 30W18g Vaughan-MerrimanWon 30
W#1 DoublesSharon Jerndt / Maro Gessell vs Angela J Randall / Kelsey Miller7-6, 2-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMaureen Knox vs Melissa Owens6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAmelia Dantzer / Peggy Roeske vs Rosie McNamee / Monica Bykowski6-3, 6-2
2024-05-16vs NITA S 30W18e Park Forest-StenoishSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMaureen Knox / Sharon Jerndt vs Therese Caraway / Paula Stasulas5-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesTeri-Lynn Tomazic vs Debra Tracy6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMaro Gessell / Julene Freund vs Brooks Stenoish / Courtney Supple5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAmelia Dantzer / Peggy Roeske vs Jennifer Basile / Ellen Zalewski6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · NITA Summer Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NITA S 30W18f Five Star-Fallon/Klepper5118615152
2NITA S 30W18c Courts Plus-Grasse/Clifford51141022181
3NITA S 30w18b Oak Brook-Savanelli4216817156
4NITA S 30W18a Five Star-Schwandt33131125190
5NITA S 30W18d Rush Copley-Dantzer/Tomazic33101430212
6NITA S 30W18e Park Forest-Stenoish1561836245
7NITA S 30W18g Vaughan-Merriman0671735248

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05
Lisa Mastin
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Alba Lane
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.70
Maureen Knox
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.57
Amelia Dantzer
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.50
Sharon Jerndt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.38
Teri-Lynn Tomazic
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.38
Julene Freund
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Emily Duerr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Julie Blocker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Liana de Angelo
published
Maro Gessell
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Michelle Sungren
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Peggy Roeske
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sharon Jerndt + Maureen Knox1542% games+10.1% vs expected
Amelia Dantzer + Julene Freund1838% games−0.1% vs expected
Teri-Lynn Tomazic + Emily Duerr5649% games−2.0% vs expected
Peggy Roeske + Julene Freund2642% gamesnot enough data
Sharon Jerndt + Julene Freund1635% gamesnot enough data
Amelia Dantzer + Peggy Roeske5067% gamesnot enough data
Julie Blocker + Julene Freund1444% gamesnot enough data
Maro Gessell + Julene Freund1444% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lisa Mastin
52W–59L career · 3 lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.05
3
Alba Lane
18W–38L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Maureen Knox
28W–25L career · 2 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.70
3
Amelia Dantzer
46W–52L career · 6 lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
2.57
3
Sharon Jerndt
66W–109L career · 4 lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
2.50
Teri-Lynn Tomazic
26W–44L career · 3 lines in 2024
80%20%<1%
2.38
3
Julene Freund
42W–65L career · 3 lines in 2024
81%19%<1%
2.38
Emily Duerr
16W–14L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Julie Blocker
4W–9L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Liana de Angelo
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Maro Gessell
4W–12L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Michelle Sungren
4W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Peggy Roeske
22W–26L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.