Teams

ROHNERT PK TC/MAGNOLIA/M PK CW8.5A

2022 COMBO · Women 8.5

14 players · average NTRP 4.25 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.95 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Kira Deguchi
published
4.25
Jocelyn Werner
published
4.24
Elizabeth Sordyl
published 4.5
4.24
Kirsten Shepard
published
4.09
Iris Beiswanger
published 4.5
4.08
Sugi Bernard
published
4.04
Erin Feely
published 4.5
3.99
Kathryn Samples
published
3.76
Jennifer Westly
published
3.54
Mary Gamble
published
3.48
Kathy Halligan
published
3.42
Erin Henke
published 3.5
Nancy Wong
published
Sara C Mazza
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Iris Beiswanger + Jocelyn Werner4161% gamesnot enough data
Mary Gamble + Kathy Halligan033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kira Deguchi
0W–13L career · no lines in 2022
96%4%<1%
4.28
Jocelyn Werner
12W–12L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Elizabeth Sordyl
10W–5L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
4.24
Kirsten Shepard
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Iris Beiswanger
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
24%75%<1%
4.09
Sugi Bernard
20W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%27%73%
4.08
4.5
Erin Feely
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
4.04
Kathryn Samples
1W–7L career · no lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
3.99
Jennifer Westly
27W–5L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.76
Mary Gamble
22W–24L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.54
Kathy Halligan
8W–14L career · no lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
3.48
3.5
Erin Henke
14W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
Nancy Wong
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sara C Mazza
9W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.