Teams

GJTC KKILLIAN

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - WS · MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER - WS

9 players · average NTRP 3.40 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-14vs GJTC RPLETTWon 40
W#1 DoublesMarlon Robles / Julio Holcomb vs Jeff Thornton / Dan Johnson6-0, 7-6
W#1 SinglesNoah Sears vs Richard Plett7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJimmy Hillan / Lorenz Ramseyer vs Paul Poudrier / John Hanna7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCharlie Gechter / Andrew Smith vs Howard Abee / Stuart Hall6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-07-07vs GJTC JWENDTLost 12
W#1 DoublesJulio Holcomb / Marlon Robles vs John Stewart / Richard Leclercq6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJimmy Hillan vs Greg Anoia3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKeith Killian / Noah Sears vs Wayne Smith / Richard Arata4-6, 2-6
2026-07-01vs GJTC PKNAYSIWon 30
W#1 DoublesLorenz Ramseyer / Julio Holcomb vs David Pacini / John Kohls6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJimmy Hillan / Curt Hansen vs Seth Ritchey / Benjamin Blair2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCharlie Gechter / Andrew Smith vs Ryan Payne / David Baugh6-2, 7-5
2026-06-23vs GJTC RPLETTLost 12
W#1 DoublesMarlon Robles / Julio Holcomb vs Dan Johnson / Matthias Schmidt6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCharlie Gechter / Andrew Smith vs Richard Plett / John Hanna3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKeith Killian / Jimmy Renfroe vs Howard Abee / Jeff Thornton6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2026-06-16vs GJTC JWENDTLost 04
L#1 DoublesLorenz Ramseyer / Noah Sears vs Greg Anoia / Ryan Scotting3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJulio Holcomb vs Richard Leclercq3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMarlon Robles / Charlie Gechter vs Blake Bickham / Richard Arata0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJimmy Hillan / Keith Killian vs Keith Decker / Mathew Dokoupil2-6, 4-6
2026-06-09vs GJTC PKNAYSIWon 40
W#1 DoublesCharlie Gechter / Julio Holcomb vs Benjamin Blair / Scott Powell7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNoah Sears vs Joseph Harawi6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJimmy Hillan / Andrew Smith vs John Kohls / David Baugh4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKeith Killian / Lorenz Ramseyer vs Paul Knaysi / Seth Ritchey5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2026-06-02vs GJTC RPLETTLost 13
L#1 DoublesJulio Holcomb / Marlon Robles vs Richard Plett / Francisco Elias6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesNoah Sears vs Matthias Schmidt4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAndrew Smith / Jimmy Hillan vs Stuart Hall / Howard Abee6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCurt Hansen / Matt Delao vs Jeff Thornton / Craig Smith4-6, 2-6
2026-05-26vs GJTC JWENDTLost 13
L#1 DoublesCharlie Gechter / Andrew Smith vs Ryan Scotting / John Stewart6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesNoah Sears vs Greg Anoia1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKeith Killian / Lorenz Ramseyer vs David Fuller / Blake Bickham1-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesJulio Holcomb / Marlon Robles vs Richard Ott / Richard Arata6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER - WS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Julio Holcomb
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
3.23
Marlon Robles
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.21
Noah Sears
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.14
Lorenz Ramseyer
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.07
Jimmy Renfroe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Jimmy Hillan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.05
Charlie Gechter
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.78
Keith Killian
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Matt Delao
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jimmy Hillan + Keith Killian4545% games+4.6% vs expected
Jimmy Renfroe + Keith Killian2543% games−3.8% vs expected
Keith Killian + Lorenz Ramseyer2738% games−4.8% vs expected
Jimmy Renfroe + Jimmy Hillan1449% gamesnot enough data
Julio Holcomb + Marlon Robles4155% gamesnot enough data
Charlie Gechter + Marlon Robles134 matchesnot enough data
Jimmy Hillan + Lorenz Ramseyer213 matchesnot enough data
Charlie Gechter + Keith Killian033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Julio Holcomb
42W–13L career · 8 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
3.25
Marlon Robles
10W–14L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
Noah Sears
8W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Lorenz Ramseyer
22W–42L career · 5 lines in 2026
14%85%<1%
3.14
Jimmy Renfroe
31W–42L career · 1 line in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.07
3.5
Jimmy Hillan
37W–35L career · 6 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Charlie Gechter
46W–33L career · 6 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.05
3
Keith Killian
40W–109L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
2.78
Matt Delao
4W–40L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.