Teams

BM BLUE

2024 CTA WOMEN'S DAYTIME DOUBLES - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - DAYTIME

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-06-20vs HIW GREENLost 01
L#2 DoublesDeanna Deorio / Julie Pontiff vs Minka Bosco / Cindy Middleton1-6, 3-6
2024-06-13vs KC-RH BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesJulie Pontiff / Deanna Deorio vs Susan Conroy / Laura MacKe7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2024-06-06vs LPTC TEALWon 10
W#3 DoublesJulie Pontiff / Deanna Deorio vs Danielle Matsuyama / Deborah Freischlag6-0, 6-1
2024-05-30vs NJ REDLost 01
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Schilling / Deanna Deorio vs Lisa Mountain / Suzanne Watkins3-6, 4-6
2024-05-23vs NJ NAVYLost 01
L#2 DoublesCasey Hemphill / Deanna Deorio vs Michelle Halliday / Stephanie Shawn6-7, 6-1, 0-1
2024-05-16vs KC-RH GREENWon 10
W#2 DoublesDeanna Deorio / Emma Schilling vs Lara Callas / Debbie Lew6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Aree Bly
published 4
3.76
Julie Pontiff
published
3.69
Jenny Kelly
published
3.65
3.64
Deanna Deorio
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.62
Sandy McGregor
published 4
3.58
Casey Hemphill
published 4
Emma Schilling
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Casey Hemphill + Jenny Kelly5065% games+13.6% vs expected
Aree Bly + Sandy McGregor8650% games+2.7% vs expected
Sandy McGregor + Jenny Kelly2743% games+2.2% vs expected
Deanna Deorio + Julie Pontiff12853% games+1.0% vs expected
Casey Hemphill + Sandy McGregor5846% games−0.5% vs expected
Deanna Deorio + Casey Hemphill211453% games−1.2% vs expected
Carolyn Schilling + Jenny Kelly81544% games−1.8% vs expected
Carolyn Schilling + Sandy McGregor044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Aree Bly
14W–12L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.80
Julie Pontiff
19W–16L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.76
Jenny Kelly
37W–39L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Carolyn Schilling
15W–33L career · type A · no lines in 2024
15%84%1%
3.65
4
Deanna Deorio
87W–56L career · 6 lines in 2024
15%84%1%
3.64
4
Sandy McGregor
90W–147L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.62
4
Casey Hemphill
64W–64L career · no lines in 2024
28%71%<1%
3.58
Emma Schilling
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.