Teams

The Plantation - Pensotti

2025 Duval Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 40 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.29 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-04-24vs SJGCC - LoferskiLost 02
L#1 DoublesCarlos Muniz / Sheila Pensotti vs Jeff Duffy / Jennifer Cremen0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTim Baird / Colleen Licata vs Roger Vaccaro / Dana Vaccaro1-5
2025-04-03vs JBTC - HansenLost 01
L#2 DoublesHeather Newby / Carlos Muniz vs Ali Hall / Richard Hansknecht4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-03-07vs SJGCC - LoferskiLost 01
L#2 DoublesTim Baird / Shannon Brady vs Betsy Crook / Jeffrey Crook2-6, 4-6
2025-02-28vs Fleming Island - PhamLost 01
L#2 DoublesTim Baird / Sheila Pensotti vs Tai Pham / Lilian Verville0-6, 4-6
2025-02-21vs Duval/Fricke/40&Over7.0MXDLost 02
L#1 DoublesSheila Pensotti / Fred Pensotti vs Polly Curole / Dan Calvo2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTim Baird / Renee Callahan vs Denise Fricke / Andy Fricke0-6, 1-6
2025-01-29vs Julington Creek - CarrLost 01
L#2 DoublesCarlos Muniz / Tina Otten vs Chris Carr / Teresa Hulshult6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2025-01-17Lost 01
L#2 DoublesCarlos Muniz / Louise Jack vs Craig Gibson / Kim Gibson3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Fred Pensotti
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.71
Carlos Muniz
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.63
Brianne Toole
published 3.5
3.23
John Hanlon
published
3.11
Renee Callahan
published
3.10
Tim Baird
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.02
2.84
Heather Newby
published 3
2.78
Colleen Licata
published 3
2.77
Brian Leschinski
published 3
2.73
Sheila Pensotti
published
Louise Jack
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Hanlon + Brianne Toole3546% gamesnot enough data
Deanna Leschinski + Brian Leschinski2348% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Fred Pensotti
107W–63L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.90
3.5
Carlos Muniz
96W–65L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.71
3.5
Brianne Toole
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.63
John Hanlon
12W–19L career · no lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
3.23
Renee Callahan
2W–20L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.11
Tim Baird
29W–101L career · 4 lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.10
3
Deanna Leschinski
3W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.02
3
Heather Newby
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
2.84
3
Colleen Licata
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Brian Leschinski
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
Sheila Pensotti
11W–15L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
Louise Jack
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.