Teams

MWaleski/SWoodall (OPRC)

2024 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 9.5 Men - Wed PM

14 players · average NTRP 4.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-10-03vs ASchulz/JDukes (Jeff Adams)Won 10
W#3 DoublesAshley Shaw / Justin Beverley vs Andrew Schulz / Shivam Desai7-5, 6-3
2024-09-11vs AVelasquez (Blakeney)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJustin Beverley / Rob Haywood vs Agustin Velasquez / Ryan Gravender5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2024-08-28vs ASchulz/JDukes (Jeff Adams)Won 10
W#1 DoublesJustin Beverley / Tommy Beecher vs Kevin Siebs / Felipe Bautista7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 9.5 Men - Wed PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.47 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.88
Sam Dean
published
4.76
Niclas Nilsson
published
Anders Persson
published 5
4.66
Rob Haywood
published
4.63
Claes Persson
published 5
4.55
Charlie Reiney
published 4.5
4.50
Eric Tan
published 4.5
4.32
Justin Beverley
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.29
Richard Merino
published
4.15
Carl Cooke
published 4.5
3.98
Michael Waleski
published
Rodrigo Pacheco
published
Stephen Woodall
published
Tommy Beecher
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Justin Beverley + Michael Waleski213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sam Dean
8W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
4.88
Niclas Nilsson
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%3%
4.76
5
Anders Persson
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rob Haywood
12W–12L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
4.66
5
Claes Persson
10W–5L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
4.63
4.5
Charlie Reiney
26W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%34%66%
4.55
4.5
Eric Tan
31W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
4.50
4.5
Justin Beverley
86W–40L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%91%9%
4.32
Richard Merino
13W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
4.29
4.5
Carl Cooke
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
4.15
Michael Waleski
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
3.98
Rodrigo Pacheco
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Stephen Woodall
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tommy Beecher
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.