Teams

Skoog/LHCC/Foothills

2023 Foothills Spring 55 & Over League · Women 3.5 - Saturday Morning

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-05-06vs McFarland/GWU/FoothillsWon 10
W#3 DoublesJackie Finley / Sally Anderson vs Wanda Page / Betty Hollingsworth6-1, 6-2
2023-04-29vs McFarland/GWU/FoothillsWon 30
W#1 DoublesRosemary Skoog / Rosa Szalanski vs Lisa McFarland / Wanda Page6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMarsha Diamonti / Sally Anderson vs Ronda Champion / Lori Martinez1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJackie Finley / Karen Hurst vs Liza Dellinger / Deborah Splawn6-4, 7-5
2023-04-15vs McFarland/GWU/FoothillsWon 30
W#1 DoublesElaine Myers / Jackie Finley vs Cheri Johnson / Liza Dellinger6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRosa Szalanski / Marsha Diamonti vs Wanda Page / Ronda Champion7-5, 7-5
W#3 DoublesSally Anderson / Rosemary Skoog vs Myra Dixon / Lori Martinez3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-03-18vs McFarland/GWU/FoothillsWon 20
W#1 DoublesRosemary Skoog / Rosa Szalanski vs Wanda Page / Cheri Johnson6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMarsha Diamonti / Karen Hurst vs Ronda Champion / Myra Dixon7-5, 6-3
2023-03-11vs McFarland/GWU/FoothillsWon 10
W#1 DoublesMarsha Diamonti / Elaine Myers vs Cheri Johnson / Ronda Champion6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 - Saturday Morning have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Jackie Finley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Elaine Myers
published 3.5
3.27
Marsha Diamonti
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.25
Rosemary Skoog
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Rosa Szalanski
published
2.99
Theresa Huggins
published
2.96
Karen Hurst
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marsha Diamonti + Rosemary Skoog262251% games−0.1% vs expected
Marsha Diamonti + Jackie Finley6851% games−6.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jackie Finley
71W–50L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Elaine Myers
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Marsha Diamonti
247W–258L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Rosemary Skoog
215W–143L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.25
Rosa Szalanski
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.21
Theresa Huggins
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
54%46%<1%
2.99
Karen Hurst
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
63%37%<1%
2.96

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.