Teams

4-MLong-Eno-18+ 7.5

2022 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · Eno River 18 & Over Combo 7.5 Women Evening

9 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-10-03vs 1-SBrogden-Eno-7.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesHannah White / Caroline Yu vs Deb Lanier / Tanya Barcinas6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2022-09-26vs 2-SEasterling-HVCCLost 01
L#2 DoublesHannah White / Sophie Plott vs Sarah Motsinger / Lindsay King1-6, 0-6
2022-09-19vs 3-JSpearman-HRLost 01
L#1 DoublesSophie Plott / Megan Chiles vs Jennifer Barrow / Lindsay Stanek1-6, 1-6
2022-08-29vs 6-ELinnander7.5-SVCLost 01
L#1 DoublesMadison Paul / Megan Chiles vs Eve Hammett / Katie Pryal6-2, 0-6, 0-1
2022-08-24vs 7-AMillholland-CHTCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Harvie / Hannah White vs Alexandra Millholland / Heather Herndon5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAmika Ekanem / Megan Chiles vs Sheridan Meltsner / Suyeon Kim2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Eno River 18 & Over Combo 7.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Caroline Yu
published 4
3.80
Elizabeth Harvie
published 4
3.80
Megan Chiles
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.67
Lisa Montague
published
3.52
Madison Paul
published
3.27
Hannah White
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.22
Susan Alden
published
2.94
Adriana Doi
published 3.5
2.82
Mary T Long
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adriana Doi + Susan Alden134 matchesnot enough data
Caroline Yu + Megan Chiles213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Caroline Yu
27W–19L career · no lines in 2022
<1%60%40%
3.97
4
Elizabeth Harvie
26W–19L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Megan Chiles
155W–47L career · 9 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
Lisa Montague
39W–48L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%1%
3.67
Madison Paul
11W–30L career · no lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
3.52
3.5
Hannah White
87W–146L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Susan Alden
15W–10L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.22
3.5
Adriana Doi
38W–90L career · type A · no lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
2.94
Mary T Long
48W–104L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
2.82

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.