Teams

MTC Britzius 12:00pm

2024 Women's Daytime Doubles · 3.5 Women

26 players · average NTRP 3.42 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Ashley Bykowski
published 3.5
3.57
Mary Kennedy
published
3.48
Emily Starita
published 3.5
3.43
Heather Berg
published 3.5
3.43
Donnette Tanner
published 3.5
3.36
Stephanie Harlan
published
3.35
Lori Wehmann
published
3.32
Jennifer Warren
published
3.27
Anna Rindt
published 3.5
3.27
Melodie Marx
published
3.24
Maggie Hillmer
published
3.21
Karla Greene
published
3.12
Nurcan Tosun
published
3.04
Pam Pittenger
published
2.93
Michelle Stork
published
2.72
Robyn Gilbertson
published
2.69
Lindsay McCarthy
published
2.68
Wanda Makis
published
2.61
2.35
Mary Gillette
published
Kelly Menth
published
Kristin von Seggern
published
Lezlie Bork
published
Loa Ann Coyle
published
Sandra Carlson
published
Scott Swanson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Berg + Ashley Bykowski11459% games+6.6% vs expected
Jennifer Warren + Emily Starita141556% games+1.7% vs expected
Maggie Hillmer + Melodie Marx191352% games−2.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ashley Bykowski
28W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%26%74%
3.58
Mary Kennedy
8W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%28%72%
3.57
3.5
Emily Starita
38W–31L career · no lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Heather Berg
12W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Donnette Tanner
14W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.43
Stephanie Harlan
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
3.36
Lori Wehmann
19W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%87%12%
3.35
Jennifer Warren
26W–27L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Anna Rindt
22W–24L career · type A · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
Melodie Marx
25W–19L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
Maggie Hillmer
31W–24L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.24
Karla Greene
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
5%93%1%
3.21
Nurcan Tosun
23W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%18%82%
3.12
Pam Pittenger
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.04
Michelle Stork
17W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
2.93
Robyn Gilbertson
6W–11L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%2%
2.72
Lindsay McCarthy
20W–33L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
2.69
Wanda Makis
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
9%91%1%
2.68
3
Carol Engebretson
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
2.61
Mary Gillette
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
88%12%<1%
2.35
Kelly Menth
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kristin von Seggern
16W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lezlie Bork
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Loa Ann Coyle
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sandra Carlson
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Scott Swanson
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.