Teams

EPatulski-ENO

2025 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 2.5 Women Evening

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-04-25vs JStewart-ENOWon 10
W#1 SinglesEmily Patulski vs Sandy Rogowski6-2, 6-0
2025-04-16Won 10
W#1 DoublesEmily Patulski / Kristi Brubaker vs Youjin Jang / Sarah Johnson6-1, 6-2
2025-04-04vs APerry-HVCCLost 01
L#1 DoublesEmily Patulski / Onyi Dillibe vs Maria Behan / Ashley Perry4-6, 6-7
2025-03-28vs MPruette-CCCLost 01
L#1 DoublesEmily Patulski / Jill Hathorn vs Lauren Long / Gwendolen Buhr2-6, 3-6
2025-03-21vs CKing-SVCWon 10
W#1 DoublesEmily Patulski / Kristi Brubaker vs Elizabeth Misiti / Cheryl Molinatto6-2, 6-1
2025-03-14vs JStewart-ENOWon 20
W#1 DoublesKristi Brubaker / Sophia Ewing vs Jane Stewart / Sandy Rogowski6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesOnyi Dillibe / Kelly Swisher vs Mary Corcoran / Yemi Runsewe6-3, 6-2
2025-02-28vs CFong-ENOWon 10
W#1 DoublesEmily Patulski / Kristi Brubaker vs Cara Fong / Colleen Starns6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 2.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.47 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.82
Sophia Ewing
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Sophia Anderson
published
2.58
Emily Patulski
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 2.5
2.56
Kristi Brubaker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Jill Hathorn
published
2.38
Elizabeth Haderer
published
2.19
Johannah Maynor
published
2.06
Onyi Dillibe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kelly Swisher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emily Patulski + Kristi Brubaker213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sophia Ewing
24W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
0%1%99%
2.82
Sophia Anderson
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
2.5
Emily Patulski
39W–35L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%29%71%
2.58
Kristi Brubaker
3W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
33%67%<1%
2.56
Jill Hathorn
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
2.50
Elizabeth Haderer
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
2.38
Johannah Maynor
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.19
Onyi Dillibe
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Kelly Swisher
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.