Teams

REILING-STOUT 40’S WINTER

2025 Adult 40 & Over Winter · 4.0 Women

20 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-03-20vs de la Riva/SwansonLost 01
L#2 DoublesKerry Reiling / Lynda Stout vs Carrie Valois / Genevieve Swanson5-7, 3-6
2025-03-13vs Toleu: 40 LoveWon 41
W#1 DoublesMartha Shannon / Doreen Remington vs Kara Kreutzer / Gretchen Seifert6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesNorma Wolk vs Lori Mosser6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCarol Schmelz / Kristine Jessen vs Katie Pargal / Susan Huff6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJennifer Magnuson / Shae Rohling vs Michelle Finley / Wendy Richards6-2, 6-3
L#4 DoublesKara Pederson / Lisa LaCombe vs Sarah Curfman / Kimberly Barry6-1, 6-7, 0-1
2025-03-06vs Hommeyer/HulbertWon 32
L#1 DoublesErika Skanse / Carol Schmelz vs Cathy Paper / Stacy Katsiyiannis7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesNorma Wolk vs Sara Ormseth7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKara Pederson / Patty Barr vs Angela Fischels / Sarah Twedt4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMartha Shannon / Doreen Remington vs Lynne Kaufman / Victoria Krauss6-4, 7-5
W#4 DoublesJennifer Magnuson / Kristine Jessen vs Tiffany Anderson / Stephanie Crowl6-2, 7-5
2025-02-20vs Jensen-Kuberski-WinterLost 14
L#1 DoublesLynda Stout / Kristine Jessen vs Karen Ostenso / Kristin Nesseth4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesMelissa Uppgren vs Virginia Kuberski7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSara Hong / Kara Pederson vs Christy Douglas / Nicole Lechner5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Magnuson / Shae Rohling vs Amy Wix / Terry Winter6-7, 3-6
L#4 DoublesDoreen Remington / Julie Woodstra vs Jocelyne Renault / Susan Gherity3-6, 2-6
2025-02-06vs Toleu: 40 LoveWon 10
W#1 DoublesKerry Reiling / Lynda Stout vs Lana Pinnock / Gretchen Seifert6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-01-30vs Hommeyer/HulbertWon 40
W#1 DoublesAndrea Boado / Lynda Stout vs Angela Fischels / Rory Osberg6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesNorma Wolk vs Sara Ormseth6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDoreen Remington / Erika Skanse vs Stacy Katsiyiannis / Cathy Paper2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Magnuson / Jennie Kawaters vs Lynne Kaufman / Victoria Krauss6-3, 6-2
2025-01-23vs Bartz/Palavecino 4.0 Winter 40+Won 41
L#1 DoublesLynda Stout / Jan Harris vs Alesia Pehl / Kelly Keegan6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMelissa Uppgren vs Leah Galaudet6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesErika Skanse / Doreen Remington vs Alexis Siegel-Carlson / Sonia Warmuth6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKara Pederson / Sara Hong vs Rachel Lund / Jill DeSanto6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#4 DoublesJennifer Magnuson / Jennie Kawaters vs Jeanne Ewen / Charlyn Francisco6-0, 6-1
2025-01-22vs Jensen-Kuberski-WinterWon 41
L#1 DoublesMartha Shannon / Erika Skanse vs Kristin Nesseth / Nicole Lechner5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJennie Kawaters vs Virginia Kuberski6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAndrea Boado / Jan Harris vs Carol Steiger / Christy Douglas6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKara Pederson / Julie Woodstra vs Rachel Reese / Kathy Brandt6-2, 6-2
W#4 DoublesCathy Charpentier / Sara Hong vs Jocelyne Renault / Amy Wix6-4, 3-1
2025-01-09vs de la Riva/SwansonWon 31
L#1 DoublesJennie Kawaters / Erika Skanse vs Genevieve Swanson / Mary O'Brien3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesNorma Wolk vs Suzanne Fenton6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLynda Stout / Jan Harris vs Caroline Agre / Stacey Jansa7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMartha Shannon / Doreen Remington vs Carey Mcgovern / Suzanne Harman6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Melissa Uppgren
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.90
Kara Pederson
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.88
Kerry Reiling
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.87
Norma Wolk
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.87
Lynda Stout
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.85
Doreen Remington
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.84
Jan Harris
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.84
Carol Schmelz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.82
Jennifer Magnuson
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #4 Doubles 40% · published
3.76
Julie Woodstra
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Cathy Charpentier
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Erika Skanse
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.73
Patty Barr
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Andrea Boado
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.72
Lisa LaCombe
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Shae Rohling
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Sara Hong
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.62
Jennie Kawaters
usually #1 Singles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.57
Martha Shannon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Kristine Jessen
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Woodstra + Kara Pederson8169% games+15.0% vs expected
Andrea Boado + Lynda Stout4263% games+14.5% vs expected
Andrea Boado + Kristine Jessen5064% games+8.0% vs expected
Patty Barr + Kara Pederson5163% games+7.1% vs expected
Jennifer Magnuson + Shae Rohling7162% games+6.8% vs expected
Patty Barr + Julie Woodstra5452% games+2.3% vs expected
Shae Rohling + Kerry Reiling5552% games−0.8% vs expected
Martha Shannon + Doreen Remington101248% games−0.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melissa Uppgren
32W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
4.00
Kara Pederson
31W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.90
4
Kerry Reiling
252W–157L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.88
Norma Wolk
50W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.87
Lynda Stout
55W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.87
Doreen Remington
28W–26L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.85
Jan Harris
16W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.84
4
Carol Schmelz
31W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.84
Jennifer Magnuson
27W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Julie Woodstra
27W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.76
4
Cathy Charpentier
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Erika Skanse
27W–21L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.75
Patty Barr
28W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Andrea Boado
60W–43L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.72
Lisa LaCombe
21W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Shae Rohling
35W–33L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Sara Hong
33W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
Jennie Kawaters
19W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
Martha Shannon
25W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
Kristine Jessen
10W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.