Teams

OC Huntington Club - Jo

2021 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC Women WD - 4.0

7 players · average NTRP 4.12 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-12-02vs OC CMTC - DeeWon 10
W#1 DoublesLaurette Jennings / Emalyn Anthony vs Stacy Tzur / Mary Huang6-2, 6-1
2021-11-19vs OC MVCC - Christy 10:30amWon 10
W#1 DoublesEmalyn Anthony / Tonianne Southron vs Christy Dozor / Jessica Geis6-1, 6-4
2021-11-12vs OC LLW MVTC - BondSplit 11
W#1 DoublesEmalyn Anthony / Christine Callas vs Terry Ward / Jackelinne Bartel4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCatherine Riegler / Ida Shu vs Denise Vallin-Corona / Joleen Wells4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 DoublesEmalyn Anthony / Nerie Ivers vs Sabrina MacLachlan / Martha Billings7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesIda Shu / Tricia Getty vs Jean Maroney / Amy Huynh6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2021-10-15Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNerie Ivers / Emalyn Anthony vs Kandis Arnold / Valerie Grady5-7, 2-6
2021-10-08vs OC Dana Hills TC - Devon 10amWon 10
W#1 DoublesKelly Lombardo / Ida Shu vs Lori Reimers / Joannes Boman6-1, 6-3
2021-09-17vs OC Lifetime SC - KellyWon 10
W#1 DoublesEmalyn Anthony / Nerie Ivers vs Michelle Duenas / Tracey Fulford7-6, 6-0
2021-09-10vs OC NBTC- MarieWon 20
W#1 DoublesNerie Ivers / Emalyn Anthony vs Miriam Morales / Jodie McCollum3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesIda Shu / Michelle Bachand vs Sabrina Newton / Laura Xu7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WD - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.18
Emalyn Anthony
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Christine Callas
published 4
3.71
Ida Shu
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.60
Kelly Lombardo
published
3.53
Rosalinda Fazio
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.42
Josephine Garrett
published
Nerie Ivers
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emalyn Anthony + Ida Shu3351% gamesnot enough data
Josephine Garrett + Kelly Lombardo044 matchesnot enough data
Rosalinda Fazio + Ida Shu123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Emalyn Anthony
107W–57L career · 7 lines in 2021
8%91%1%
4.18
4
Christine Callas
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Ida Shu
61W–66L career · 4 lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.71
Kelly Lombardo
0W–4L career · no lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Rosalinda Fazio
96W–130L career · 7 lines in 2021
41%59%<1%
3.53
Josephine Garrett
7W–19L career · no lines in 2021
73%27%<1%
3.42
Nerie Ivers
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.