Teams

NIN FW 40&O 3.5 M: WW Grismore

NIN FW Adult 40 & Over · NIN FW 40 & Over 3.5 Men

5 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-20vs NIN FW 40&O 3.5 M: WW White/WagnerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDan Grismore / Joseph Kosnik vs Jimmy Brown / Joseph Henry3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichael Marietta / Michael Krahn vs Timothy Bussick / Andrew Wagner7-5, 6-3
2026-07-13vs NIN FW 40&O 3.5 M: WW White/WagnerLost 02
L#1 SinglesCharles Vu vs Kayle Davis6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#4 DoublesJoseph Kosnik / Richard Kelty vs Steve White / Jason Sagan3-6, 0-6
2026-06-29Won 10
W#3 DoublesEvan Nichols / Charles Vu vs Timothy Bussick / Andrew Wagner6-4, 6-2
2026-06-22Split 11
W#1 DoublesDan Grismore / Michael Krahn vs Abner Mendador / Craig Welch7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L#4 DoublesMichael Marietta / Randy Wilson vs Andrew Wagner / Joseph Henry6-7, 5-7
2026-06-08vs NIN FW 40&O 3.5 M: WW White/WagnerLost 03
L#2 DoublesRandy Wilson / Michael Marietta vs Jimmy Brown / Andrew Wagner5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMichael Krahn / Dan Grismore vs John Nichols / Kayle Davis6-7, 6-7
L#4 DoublesNicholas Wallace / Joseph Kosnik vs Steve White / Timothy Bussick1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRandy Wilson / Michael Marietta vs Vijay Kamineni / Andrew Wagner2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichael Krahn / Darren Vogt vs David Li / Kayle Davis7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · NIN FW 40 & Over 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NIN FW 40&O 3.5 M: WW White/Wagner61221330267
2NIN FW 40&O 3.5 M: WW Grismore16132249362

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Michael Marietta
usually #4 Doubles 29%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.46
Charles Vu
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.35
Michael Krahn
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.96
Joseph Kosnik
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Randy Wilson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Krahn + Michael Marietta4250% gamesnot enough data
Randy Wilson + Joseph Kosnik033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Marietta
143W–96L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.49
3.5
Charles Vu
42W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.46
Michael Krahn
101W–89L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
3.35
Joseph Kosnik
19W–48L career · 3 lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
2.96
Randy Wilson
39W–36L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.