Teams

Boulos

2025 Leon Adult 40 & Over · 3.0W Adult 40 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-03-17vs FlowersSplit 22
W#1 DoublesChristine Boulos / Beatriz Cepeda vs Amy Cade / Nicole Watson6-3, 7-6
L#1 SinglesBarkley Wilhite vs Lauren Javanmardi2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBeata Ewa Los / Priscilla Bailey-Brown vs Julie Moss / Kristen Knapp4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesDebara Jump / Kyley Weida vs Kim Bertron / Kimberly Curry4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-02-17vs FlowersSplit 22
L#1 DoublesBarkley Wilhite / Christine Boulos vs Nicole Watson / Amy Cade6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesNada Usina vs Kimberly Curry4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSviatlana Sankovich / Priscilla Bailey-Brown vs Julie Moss / Andrea Gale6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesEllen Cannon / Beata Ewa Los vs Karen Devorace / MICHELLE BEMBRY6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-02-10vs FlowersLost 12
W#1 DoublesPriscilla Bailey-Brown / Barkley Wilhite vs Leah Marino / Nicole Watson7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDebara Jump / Michelle Winokur vs Karen Devorace / Julie Moss4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKyley Weida / Beata Ewa Los vs Kimberly Curry / MICHELLE BEMBRY6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0W Adult 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.09
Beatriz Cepeda
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Barkley Wilhite
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
Christine Boulos
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.64
Beata Ewa Los
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.54
Debara Jump
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.49
Michelle Winokur
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.44
Cyndi Knox
published 2.5
Ellen Cannon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kyley Weida
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Nada Usina
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Priscilla Bailey-Brown
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Sviatlana Sankovich
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Beatriz Cepeda
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
3
Barkley Wilhite
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Christine Boulos
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Beata Ewa Los
5W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
2.64
3
Debara Jump
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
2.54
Michelle Winokur
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
0%53%47%
2.49
2.5
Cyndi Knox
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%65%35%
2.44
Ellen Cannon
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kyley Weida
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nada Usina
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Priscilla Bailey-Brown
7W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sviatlana Sankovich
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.