Teams

SFV-Pure Drive

SFV-Tri-Level Mixed-18 & Over · SFV - Mixed 3.0-4.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.61 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-12-11Won 10
W#2 DoublesTerry Wingo / September Ryken vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-12-05Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJohn Rochford / Lisa Kreuser vs Alain Banas / Julianne Wood4-6, 3-6
2021-11-14vs SFV-Porter CrushersLost 02
L#1 DoublesJohn Rochford / Donna Hoppe vs Maureen Shideh / Dhruv Sareen1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesFrank Abt / September Ryken vs Zach Horowitz / Michele Venegas6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesAimee Butcher / John Rochford vs Kathrina Cruz / Todd Snyder2-6, 2-6
2021-10-17vs SFV-Paseo Crazy AcesLost 01
L#1 DoublesJohn Rochford / Donna Hoppe vs Alex Choi / Monique Reyes6-3, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV - Mixed 3.0-4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Aimee Butcher
published 4
3.73
Lisa Kreuser
published
3.64
Frank Abt
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.40
Marcos Sevilla
published
3.37
Edward Hatch
published 4
3.30
Diana Amado
published 3.5
3.25
John Rochford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Jacque Clendennen
published 3.5
3.10
Gregory Straub
published 3.5
3.04
Terry Wingo
published
2.86
September Ryken
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.85
Hanan Asfoury
published 3
John Kniest
published
Laima Zbojniewicz
published
Russell Baingo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

September Ryken + Frank Abt213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Aimee Butcher
5W–4L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.80
Lisa Kreuser
108W–53L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Frank Abt
114W–63L career · 5 lines in 2021
14%85%<1%
3.64
Marcos Sevilla
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
79%21%<1%
3.40
4
Edward Hatch
7W–21L career · no lines in 2021
85%15%<1%
3.37
3.5
Diana Amado
4W–5L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
John Rochford
52W–50L career · 4 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Jacque Clendennen
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Gregory Straub
4W–6L career · no lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
3.10
Terry Wingo
8W–20L career · no lines in 2021
38%62%<1%
3.04
3.5
September Ryken
81W–221L career · 2 lines in 2021
86%14%<1%
2.86
3
Hanan Asfoury
11W–9L career · no lines in 2021
<1%87%13%
2.85
John Kniest
0W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Laima Zbojniewicz
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Russell Baingo
8W–13L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.