Teams

MONTE VISTA HS CW6.5A

2024 COMBO · Women 6.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-10-19vs STONEBRAE CC CW6.5AWon 10
W#3 DoublesCaroline D Sherbourne / Florita Labrador vs Jazelle Nono / JUDY TRAN6-1, 7-6
2024-10-05vs BAY TREES PK CW6.5BWon 10
W#2 DoublesFlorita Labrador / Caroline D Sherbourne vs Marcia Loss / Lana Rak6-2, 6-3
2024-09-28vs PLEASANTON CW6.5AWon 10
W#3 DoublesCaroline D Sherbourne / Florita Labrador vs Emily Amott / Cindy Harrington6-1, 7-5
2024-09-25vs BLACKHAWK CC CW6.5ALost 01
L#2 DoublesNancy Blom / Florita Labrador vs Sara Hughes / Ramya Jayaraman2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Sanna Garcia
published
3.37
3.28
Janet Race
published
3.27
Nancy Blom
published
3.21
Cathy Althoff
published 3.5
3.11
Florence Huang
published 3.5
3.10
Teri Frangie
published
2.96
Patty Ly
published
2.93
Florita Labrador
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.93
Maria Chiang
published
2.93
Meilan Liu
published
2.92
Daljeet Singh
published 3.5
Amanda Coggins
published 3
2.52
Susan Levy
published
Kathleen Olson
published
Mayra Dominguez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Blom + Cathy Althoff5646% games−4.0% vs expected
Daljeet Singh + Sanna Garcia044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sanna Garcia
13W–23L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Caroline D Sherbourne
9W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
3.37
Janet Race
9W–21L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.28
Nancy Blom
12W–11L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Cathy Althoff
8W–14L career · no lines in 2024
5%93%1%
3.21
Laurel Anderson-Malinovsky
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Florence Huang
5W–15L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.11
Teri Frangie
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.10
Patty Ly
18W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Florita Labrador
69W–72L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
2.93
Maria Chiang
11W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
2.93
Meilan Liu
10W–22L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%28%
2.93
3.5
Daljeet Singh
3W–25L career · no lines in 2024
73%27%<1%
2.92
3
Amanda Coggins
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Levy
2W–13L career · no lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
2.52
Kathleen Olson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mayra Dominguez
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.