Teams

ASmith/CMurphy (PPRSC)

2024 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-07vs LMadonna/MWolf (WSRC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesAdrienne Smith / Corinne McBrier vs Julie Austin / Kelly Keen6-0, 6-3
2024-04-23Won 10
W#1 DoublesAdrienne Smith / Corinne McBrier vs Gretchen Orr / Brooke Hopkins6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2024-04-17vs TLaBrosse/Rafferty (Carmel)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesAdrienne Smith vs Andrea Whitmore0-6, 0-6
2024-04-16vs BGodfrey (Firethorne Country Club)Split 11
L#1 DoublesAdrienne Smith / Linda Shawen vs Nichole Hayden / Beth Godfrey4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesCorinne McBrier vs Sheri Noot7-6, 6-1
2024-04-02vs JMugnano (Park Road)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAdrienne Smith / Erin Pavelchak vs Emily Pansa / Ashley Bejsovec7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2024-03-19vs MBrown/ELaur (Raintree)Won 10
W#1 DoublesAdrienne Smith / Corinne McBrier vs Madison Brown / Christina Hall6-2, 6-2
2024-03-12vs MBurns (Jeff Adams)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAdrienne Smith / Erin Pavelchak vs Mallory Burns / Doga Karyaldiz5-7, 3-6
2024-03-05vs JKarsek (Carmel)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAdrienne Smith / Lindsay Spokas vs Anne McCurry / Melissa Cronin2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.47 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Corinne McBrier
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.98
Adrienne Smith
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.33
Virginia Schmidt
published
2.31
Margaret Harding
published
2.27
Erin Pavelchak
published
2.19
Meredith BROUSE
published
2.18
Alaine Patton
published 2.5
Jenna Vaporis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Corinne McBrier + Adrienne Smith14955% games+5.8% vs expected
Margaret Harding + Virginia Schmidt2345% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Corinne McBrier
51W–29L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%42%58%
3.03
3
Adrienne Smith
61W–40L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
2.98
Virginia Schmidt
7W–19L career · no lines in 2024
0%89%11%
2.33
Margaret Harding
8W–21L career · no lines in 2024
0%91%9%
2.31
Erin Pavelchak
4W–15L career · no lines in 2024
0%95%5%
2.27
Meredith BROUSE
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.19
2.5
Alaine Patton
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.18
Jenna Vaporis
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.