Teams

RR BASS

2025 FW Ladies 65 & Over · 7.0 FW Ladies

12 players · average NTRP 3.31 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-12vs ATC SCHMIDT/BOYDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSandra Owens / Susan Berry vs Kim Bell / Debbie Johnson6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Orser / Belita Townsend vs Monique ROBINSON / Rebecca Buddenbohn0-6, 2-6
2025-05-05vs RTC DRIVER/TREVATHANLost 12
W#1 DoublesJayne Gornik / Belita Townsend vs Diane O'Mara / Kim Wilson7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJulie Conant / Elizabeth Orser vs Tracey Driver / Marilyn Trevathan0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAnita Zimmerman / Dianne Dugan vs Jill Stallard / Sherrie Panter2-6, 1-6
2025-04-21vs ATC SCHMIDT/BOYDWon 21
W#1 DoublesSandra Owens / Jayne Gornik vs Rebecca Buddenbohn / Monique ROBINSON6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesHeidi Mireiter / Elizabeth Orser vs Barbara Chonko / Kim Simpson7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBarbara Bent / Susan Berry vs Cass Weyandt / Kelley Stetzer6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2025-04-14vs RTC DRIVER/TREVATHANLost 12
W#1 DoublesBelita Townsend / Jayne Gornik vs Deena Nutt / Kimberly Blakey6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJulie Conant / Deborah Iverson vs Nancy Mullins / Louise Otto3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBarbara Bent / Julie Theilken vs Diane O'Mara / Sherrie Panter3-6, 0-6
2025-03-31vs ATC SCHMIDT/BOYDWon 21
W#1 DoublesSandra Owens / Belita Townsend vs Carole Green / Kim Bell6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAnita Zimmerman / Dianne Dugan vs Barbara Chonko / Christy Silvas4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesBarbara Bent / Susan Berry vs Jane Schmidt / Gayle Howington6-3, 6-4
2025-03-24vs RTC DRIVER/TREVATHANLost 03
L#1 DoublesSandra Owens / Susan Berry vs Pamela Eppinette / Louise Otto6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesHeidi Mireiter / Elizabeth Orser vs Nancy Mullins / Kimberly Blakey2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDeborah Iverson / Julie Theilken vs Carol O'Hanlon / Jill Stallard3-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 FW Ladies have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Belita Townsend
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Barbara Bent
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Deborah Iverson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Heidi Mireiter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Anita Zimmerman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.91
Julie Theilken
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Catherine Bass
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Dianne Dugan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Elizabeth Orser
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jayne Gornik
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Julie Conant
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Berry
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anita Zimmerman + Dianne Dugan2343% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Orser + Heidi Mireiter134 matchesnot enough data
Belita Townsend + Jayne Gornik213 matchesnot enough data
Belita Townsend + Julie Conant033 matchesnot enough data
Barbara Bent + Susan Berry213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Belita Townsend
5W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Barbara Bent
3W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Deborah Iverson
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Heidi Mireiter
8W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Anita Zimmerman
8W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.09
Julie Theilken
5W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
2.91
3
Catherine Bass
8W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Dianne Dugan
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Elizabeth Orser
2W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jayne Gornik
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Julie Conant
3W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Berry
11W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.