Teams

Yates 40s 6.5 Combo W Thurs PM

2025 Piedmont Combo 40 & Over · 6.5 40 & Over Women

13 players · average NTRP / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
L#1 DoublesMeghan Flynn / Grace Messinger vs Kari Eddington / Elia Mavronikolas3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJessica Neal / Samantha Price vs Charlotte Boone / Donna Keel4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLeigh Trigilio / Leslie Sheppard vs Tammy Tao / Sue O'Shaughnessy4-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesMeghan Flynn / Leslie Sheppard vs Evie Curley / Lauren Johnson6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJennifer Yates / Laurie Smith vs Tara Rusiewicz / Liz Busch6-4, 6-4
2025-10-05vs GOY 40s 6.5 Combo W Thurs PMLost 03
L#1 DoublesStephanie Gilmer / Pamela Bilodeau vs Crystal Mercado / Celestial Corridon2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLeslie Sheppard / Laurie Smith vs Gina Goy / Sarah Kaplan4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKathryn Strup / Leigh Trigilio vs Thais Warwar / Cheryl Rankin2-6, 4-6
2025-09-18vs Linden 40s 6.5 Combo W Thurs PMLost 12
L#1 DoublesSamantha Price / Leigh Trigilio vs Sheila Schmedes / Andrea Spencer1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMeghan Flynn / Grace Messinger vs Donna Esson / Philia Leach0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKim Kyle / Jessica Neal vs Pamela Aikens / Renuka Shivaji6-2, 6-3
2025-08-28vs Pretzsch 40s 6.5 Combo W Thurs PMLost 12
L#1 DoublesJennifer Yates / Jessica Neal vs Lisa Cassidy / Faye Halvorsen6-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLeigh Trigilio / Leslie Sheppard vs Vangie Cruz / Donna Burick4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesKathryn Strup / Grace Messinger vs Carrie Tauber / Kelly Albright3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-08-26vs Dagger 40s 6.5 Combo W Thurs PMLost 03
L#1 DoublesSamantha Price / Meghan Flynn vs Courtney Dagger / Hayes Mills3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesHunter Arnett / Kim Kyle vs Leann Spencer / Janet Howard2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJessica Neal / Laurie Smith vs Barbara Robinson / Sandy Cathers1-6, 4-6
2025-08-23vs Vartanian 40s 6.5 Combo W Thurs PMLost 02
L#1 DoublesMeghan Flynn / Leslie Sheppard vs Ashley Vartanian / Hilary Holderness6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesHunter Arnett / Stephanie Gilmer vs Weezie Keiner / Katie Breeding2-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesLeslie Sheppard / Pamela Bilodeau vs Betsy Harrington / Rebecca Sheppard2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesGrace Messinger / Jessica Neal vs Stacy Thurm / Jennifer Russell2-6, 1-1
L#3 DoublesJennifer Yates / Hunter Arnett vs Nancy Bryant / Louise Cox4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-08-18vs Pressley 40s 6.5 Combo W Thurs PMLost 03
L#1 DoublesStephanie Gilmer / Laurie Smith vs Krista Pressley / Andrea Hayes3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesHunter Arnett / Samantha Price vs Christa Wykoff / Amy Jones2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMeghan Flynn / Grace Messinger vs Lara Heberle / Laura Walters4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Stephanie Gilmer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.19
Samantha Price
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.04
Jennifer Yates
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
2.95
Jessica Neal
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.92
Pamela Bilodeau
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Leigh Trigilio
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.72
Meghan Flynn
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
2.60
Hunter Arnett
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Grace Messinger
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Kathryn Strup
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kim Kyle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Leslie Sheppard
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Lori Aycock
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meghan Flynn + Grace Messinger033 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Gilmer + Jessica Neal123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Gilmer
11W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Samantha Price
22W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.19
Jennifer Yates
8W–28L career · 7 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.04
Jessica Neal
18W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
Pamela Bilodeau
4W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.92
Leigh Trigilio
2W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
2.79
Meghan Flynn
17W–37L career · 6 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Hunter Arnett
7W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60
Grace Messinger
2W–3L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathryn Strup
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kim Kyle
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Leslie Sheppard
4W–12L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lori Aycock
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.