Teams

9-SEasterling-HVCC

2023 Eno River Adult 40 & Over · 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Women-Evening

14 players · average NTRP 3.36 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-05-10vs 4-TBrooks40-ElmiraLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmanda Lacoff / Anne Costello vs Tenesha Carter / Terry Perrone3-6, 6-0, 0-1
2023-04-20vs 7-KWhitley-EnoSplit 11
L#1 SinglesStephanie Perun vs Abigail Holden1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAmanda Lacoff / Ruth Caccavale vs Hope Graney / Stacie White6-0, 6-0
2023-04-18vs 5-SBrogden-Eno 40 3.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesAmanda Lacoff / Mary Susan Easterling vs Joanne Kochuk / Berna Tareen3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-04-06vs 6-MSanchez-ENOLost 01
L#2 DoublesJoan Mueller / Stephanie Perun vs Kolleen Fitzgerald / Karli Eller2-6, 1-6
2023-03-23vs 2-DAdams 40 -ENOWon 10
W#1 DoublesMary Susan Easterling / Amanda Lacoff vs Sheridan Meltsner / Brook Holton Sheahan2-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Women-Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Amanda Lacoff
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.60
Amy Herman
published 3.5
3.56
Anne Costello
published 3.5
3.47
Lindsay King
published
3.41
Caroline Hamilton
published 3.5
3.35
3.16
Jennifer Pyle
published
3.14
Joan Mueller
published
3.09
Ruth Caccavale
published
3.07
Gina Goldthwaite
published
2.97
Lauren Powell
published
2.94
Carolyn Davidson
published 3
2.84
Stephanie Perun
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.71
Caroline Carrico
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lindsay King + Amanda Lacoff303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amanda Lacoff
189W–114L career · 11 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.66
3.5
Amy Herman
22W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%25%75%
3.60
3.5
Anne Costello
15W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%34%66%
3.56
Lindsay King
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
60%40%<1%
3.47
3.5
Caroline Hamilton
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.41
Mary Susan Easterling
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%14%
3.35
Jennifer Pyle
10W–2L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.16
Joan Mueller
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%1%
3.14
Ruth Caccavale
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
25%74%<1%
3.09
Gina Goldthwaite
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.07
Lauren Powell
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Carolyn Davidson
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Stephanie Perun
34W–67L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%87%12%
2.84
3
Caroline Carrico
1W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
2.71

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.