Teams

PVIC Neblett

2025 Duval Trilevel 18 & Over Men - Summer · 4.5

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-23vs Baymeadows VijayLost 01
L#1 DoublesChris Neblett / Frederick Weiland vs Tim Shoptaugh / Ryan Nestor0-6, 0-6
2025-09-16vs Baymeadows VijayLost 01
L#1 DoublesChris Neblett / Frederick Weiland vs Tim Shoptaugh / Michael Nieves3-6, 4-6
2025-08-26vs Palencia RobinsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesChris Neblett / Brad Lehan vs Sebastian Torrealba / Christian Hosking6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-08-19vs Boone Park RutsteinLost 01
L#1 DoublesChris Neblett / William Bell vs Darren Odendaal / Corey Graf0-6, 5-7
2025-07-29vs FYC GriffithLost 01
L#1 DoublesChris Neblett / Brian Tunick vs Chuck Griffith / Ian Germoglio2-6, 1-6
2025-07-22vs Palencia RobinsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesChris Neblett / Frederick Weiland vs Harrell Robinson / Owen Price3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brad Lehan
published 4.5
Frederick Weiland
published 4.5
3.62
Chris Neblett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Steven Alpert
published
3.39
Butch Reese
published 3.5
3.35
Rob DeJesus
published
3.30
William Prescott
published
3.23
Ben Landis
published 3.5
Michael Curet
published
Michael Shepherd
published
Robert Wilcox
published
William Bell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ben Landis + Rob DeJesus314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brad Lehan
0W–1L career · type A · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Frederick Weiland
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Chris Neblett
20W–49L career · 6 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.62
Steven Alpert
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.54
3.5
Butch Reese
16W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Rob DeJesus
11W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.35
William Prescott
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Ben Landis
13W–9L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Michael Curet
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Shepherd
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Robert Wilcox
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
William Bell
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.