Teams

Vandever/Nashville

2026 Adult 18 & Over - Nashville · 3.0 Men - Saturday Daytime

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-04-22vs Alessi/Pershad/NashvilleLost 23
W#1 DoublesKyle Shaffer / Jesse Harrison vs Mitch Rotondo / Philippe Bronchtein4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKenny Sallis vs Joseph Wrubel0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJeff Gannon / Kevin Mottram vs Louis Alessi / Yash Pershad2-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesMichael Bordieri vs Mateo Arana6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesTaylor Vandever / Jason Taylor vs Alexandre Hirlinger / Ben Reimer4-6, 0-6
2026-03-21vs Cooke/NashvilleWon 31
W#1 DoublesKyle Shaffer / Jesse Harrison vs Davis Cooke / Jacob Rodriguez6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesGreg Triplett vs Campbell Luschen6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTaylor Vandever / Jason Taylor vs Luke Townsend / Jake Padilla4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMatthew Adams / Jeff Gannon vs Joseph-ross Smith / Donald Hollowell6-3, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men - Saturday Daytime have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Greg Triplett
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.00
Michael Bordieri
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.85
Jeff Gannon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.78
Jason Taylor
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.76
Kyle Shaffer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.74
Kevin Mottram
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
Jesse Harrison
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Taylor Vandever
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.51
Beau Massengille
published 3
2.42
Kenny Sallis
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.33
Joshua White
published
Matthew Adams
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beau Massengille + Jesse Harrison2447% games+9.4% vs expected
Taylor Vandever + Kyle Shaffer4257% gamesnot enough data
Taylor Vandever + Jesse Harrison314 matchesnot enough data
Taylor Vandever + Kenny Sallis303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Greg Triplett
10W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%22%78%
3.11
Michael Bordieri
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.00
Jeff Gannon
7W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
Jason Taylor
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Kyle Shaffer
11W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.76
Kevin Mottram
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
Jesse Harrison
12W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Taylor Vandever
16W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Beau Massengille
5W–5L career · no lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
2.51
Kenny Sallis
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
71%29%<1%
2.42
Joshua White
6W–5L career · no lines in 2026
89%11%<1%
2.33
Matthew Adams
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.