← Teams

MAC-McPhee/Parker

2025 Adult 55 & Over · 9.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 4.41 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.93 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Nicole Griffith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.13
Mariniah Prendergast
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.11
Trina Denson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.09
Jennifer Devoe
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.08
Cynthia McPhee
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.06
Stacy Hawkins Parker
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.95
Amy Leahy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.84
Lisa Handley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.70
Heidi Clark
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.67
Linda Lovett
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.62
Laura Luthi
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
Results6 ties
2024-11-24Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesStacy Hawkins Parker / Jennifer Devoe vs Michelle Donato / Carrie Fisher6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAmy Leahy / Nicole Griffith vs Sarah Morris / Janet Tabor6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCynthia McPhee / Loann Wong vs Kerstin Anderson / Kirsten Barnes6-4, 6-3
2024-11-17Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesJennifer Devoe / Stacy Hawkins Parker vs Michelle Donato / Carrie Fisher2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCynthia McPhee / Heidi Clark vs Kerstin Anderson / Kirsten Barnes6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLoann Wong / Laura Luthi vs Janet Tabor / Mary Anderson6-2, 6-3
2024-10-27Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesStacy Hawkins Parker / Trina Denson vs Feng Grove / Xia Wu6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLisa Handley / Heidi Clark vs Rebecca Redding / Yuko Hopman6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesLoann Wong / Nicole Griffith vs Anne McCroskey / Kirsten Giacomini6-3, 7-6
2024-10-19Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesNicole Griffith / Stacy Hawkins Parker vs Kristin Fudalla / Rhonda Thomas6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAmy Leahy / Elise Orban vs Minou Chau / June Wu7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLoann Wong / Cynthia McPhee vs Trish Vawter / Karen Sullivan6-4, 6-4
2024-10-06Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesCynthia McPhee / Lisa Handley vs Patricia Evola / Rebecca Redding7-6, 7-5
W#2 DoublesNicole Griffith / Stacy Hawkins Parker vs Sue Gregoire / Kirsten Giacomini7-5, 6-0
L#3 DoublesHeidi Clark / Laura Luthi vs Cathrine Olander / Kimberly Quach7-6, 6-2
2024-09-28Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesTrina Denson / Mariniah Prendergast vs Crystal Bryant / Monika Dolega-kowalewski6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesElise Orban / Amy Leahy vs Noriko Satake / Monique Eldridge6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLinda Lovett / Jennifer Devoe vs Kristin Fudalla / Rhonda Thomas6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Nicole Griffith
14W–26L career
not enough data
—
4.5
Mariniah Prendergast
52W–33L career
3%96%0%
4.13
4.5
Trina Denson
46W–18L career
8%92%1%
4.11
4.5
Jennifer Devoe
31W–20L career
12%86%1%
4.09
4.5
Cynthia McPhee
38W–30L career
8%91%0%
4.08
4.5
Stacy Hawkins Parker
58W–55L career
8%92%0%
4.06
4.5
Amy Leahy
73W–57L career
27%73%0%
3.95
4.5
Lisa Handley
41W–32L career
56%44%0%
3.84
4.5
Heidi Clark
42W–52L career
86%14%0%
3.70
4
Linda Lovett
93W–105L career
4%96%0%
3.67
4
Laura Luthi
30W–28L career
10%90%0%
3.62

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.