Teams

CSU GREEN

2024 USTA ADULT 65 & OVER - NOCO · MEN 7.0 - 65 & OVER - NOCO

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-16vs MLF NAVYWon 10
W#1 DoublesRodney Campos / David Rhodes vs Mike Yoder / Dale Clarken6-3, 6-0
2024-08-02vs TAG BLUEWon 10
W#1 DoublesJoseph Maurier / Mike Keefe vs Robb Audette / Eric Pavilonis4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-07-26Won 10
W#1 DoublesRodney Campos / Scott Martin vs William Donkersgoed / Jim Walker6-3, 6-0
2024-07-19vs MLF NAVYLost 01
L#2 DoublesAndrew Hiller / Joseph Maurier vs Chris Fergen / James Dyer2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-07-11vs TAG BLUEWon 20
W#2 DoublesRodney Campos / Robert Woodmansee vs Stan Axtell / Jim Draper6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJoseph Maurier / Scott Martin vs James Demersseman / Steve Weber6-0, 6-4
2024-06-28vs LVTA ORANGEWon 10
W#3 DoublesRodney Campos / Robert Woodmansee vs Jack Tuttle / Paul Akers6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 7.0 - 65 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Shane Miller
published
3.32
Rodney Campos
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.25
Andrew Hiller
published 3.5
3.08
Joseph Maurier
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.01
Mike Keefe
published 3.5
Ernest Chavez
published
Robert Woodmansee
published
Walter Steige
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shane Miller + Robert Woodmansee7063% gamesnot enough data
Mike Keefe + Robert Woodmansee1443% gamesnot enough data
Ernest Chavez + Joseph Maurier213 matchesnot enough data
Rodney Campos + Mike Keefe213 matchesnot enough data
Mike Keefe + Andrew Hiller033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shane Miller
19W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Rodney Campos
56W–26L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%89%9%
3.32
3.5
Andrew Hiller
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.25
3.5
Joseph Maurier
74W–52L career · 3 lines in 2024
28%71%<1%
3.08
3.5
Mike Keefe
15W–23L career · no lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
3.01
Ernest Chavez
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Robert Woodmansee
9W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Walter Steige
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.