Teams

BBTC - Nichols

2024 Singles League 18 & Over-GC · Women 4.0+

7 players · average NTRP 3.83 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-12-03vs OSTC - MayWon 20
W#1 SinglesBridget Dougherty Mendenhall vs Abby Chapman1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 SinglesCarly Nichols Coy vs Jennifer Maisano6-0, 6-4
2024-11-11vs OSTC - MayWon 21
L#1 SinglesShelly Williams vs Abby Chapman3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesCarly Nichols Coy vs Delaney Adamo6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesTrinity Henn vs Stacie Zorn7-5, 6-2
2024-11-05vs OSTC - MayWon 30
W#1 SinglesBridget Dougherty Mendenhall vs Tana Cooper6-4, 6-0
W#2 SinglesLynette Cooper vs Delaney Adamo6-3, 6-1
W#3 SinglesTrinity Henn vs Stacie Zorn6-3, 6-4
2024-10-28vs OSTC - MaySplit 11
W#1 SinglesShelly Williams vs Abby Chapman6-4, 6-0
L#3 SinglesBridget Dougherty Mendenhall vs Kelsey Martin4-6, 7-5
2024-10-22vs OSTC - MayWon 21
W#1 SinglesCarly Nichols Coy vs Karah Brown6-1, 6-3
L#2 SinglesNeely Gaddy vs Tana Cooper3-6, 5-7
W#3 SinglesBridget Dougherty Mendenhall vs Delaney Adamo6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 4.0+
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BBTC - Nichols50123795
2OSTC - May0531226170

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Carly Nichols Coy
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 4
3.79
Lynette Cooper
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.74
Shelly Williams
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.66
Bridget Dougherty Mendenhall
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.40
Trinity Henn
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.04
Angie Simmons
published 4
Neely Gaddy
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carly Nichols Coy + Lynette Cooper303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carly Nichols Coy
60W–14L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
3.98
Lynette Cooper
79W–14L career · 1 line in 2024
1%93%5%
3.79
Shelly Williams
70W–44L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.74
3.5
Bridget Dougherty Mendenhall
26W–26L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%11%89%
3.66
Trinity Henn
15W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.40
4
Angie Simmons
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
3.04
Neely Gaddy
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.