Teams

SFV - Scholland Garros 6.0

2025 Mixed 18+ Winter · SFV 18 & Over - 6.0 MxD

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-29vs SFV - Nikki's Tennis Crew 6.0MxWon 30
W#1 DoublesKwon S Yun / Emily Park vs Jared Barboza / Lourdes Price6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJohn Shin / Sumi Im vs Scott Vandiver / Allison Branda6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJoo Hyung Oh / Soo Ran Baek vs Brandon Sierra / Cleo Burtley6-2, 6-2
2025-03-23vs SFV - WC Ball BreakersLost 12
L#1 DoublesJohn Shin / Soo Ran Baek vs Cindy Larson / Federico Martell Jr1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDeborah Kim / Jun Tan vs Jorge Velasco / Sally Miller2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesJin Kim / Kee Seok Mah vs Ada Ramirez / Andrew Wheeler6-3, 6-4
2025-03-22vs SFV - Toluca Lake TempestWon 30
W#1 DoublesEmily Park / Kee Seok Mah vs Phuong Tran / Jason Wang6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDeborah Kim / Jun Tan vs Susannah Blinkoff / Jordan Corngold2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSumi Im / Kwon S Yun vs Teresa Lin / Stephen Garrett6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2025-03-01vs SFV - Racketeers 6.0MxLost 01
L#1 DoublesKwon S Yun / Keum Ko vs Michael Pazirandeh / Letty King1-6, 2-6
2025-02-09vs SFV - L'Esprit de TennisWon 10
W#1 DoublesKeum Ko / John Shin vs Lena Tsodykovskaya / Gagik Trdatyan6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 18 & Over - 6.0 MxD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Keum Ko
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.12
Soo Ran Baek
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.94
Jun Tan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Sumi Im
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.90
Kee Seok Mah
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.87
Deborah Kim
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.87
Kwon S Yun
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.77
Jin Kim
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
Yena Hong
published
Joo Hyung Oh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Yongmo Park
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Keum Ko
109W–69L career · 5 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
Soo Ran Baek
9W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
Jun Tan
11W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.94
Sumi Im
18W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
Kee Seok Mah
15W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
2.90
3
Deborah Kim
23W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
Kwon S Yun
18W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
Jin Kim
13W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Yena Hong
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
2.56
Joo Hyung Oh
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Yongmo Park
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.