Teams

Mercurio Chestnut Oaks 5.5

2025 Richmond Combo Weekend · Richmond Combo Weekend 5.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 2.62 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-09-14vs MAC BiddleLost 03
L#1 DoublesChad Morris / Anil Naidu vs Andrew Biddle / Joseph Gault3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesParker Wirsch / Michael Elander vs Evan Dodd / Dan Dennis4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAdonis Salinas / Elamaran Anbalagan vs Lawrence Golixer / Paul Haynes0-6, 2-6
2025-09-06vs Willow Oaks FranksLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnil Naidu / Douglas Lines vs Alex Burnett / Greg Dinardo3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSam Taylor / Elamaran Anbalagan vs Thomas Robertson / Raymond Cargill1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesParker Wirsch / Michael Elander vs Declan O'Connell / Ryan Fanelli0-6, 0-6
2025-09-03vs BMT 2.0 - SharrarLost 12
L#1 DoublesAdonis Salinas / Marshall Powell vs Erik Ringberg / Jason Walek0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesElamaran Anbalagan / Douglas Lines vs John Weiland / Stephen Demella4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSam Taylor / Michael Elander vs David Sharrar / Ricky Wong3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-08-23vs SCC PercyLost 03
L#1 DoublesRobert Mercurio / Chad Morris vs Michael Hyatt / Justin Appelbee4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMarshall Powell / Gordon Wisotzki vs Paul Piotrowski / John Troy Owens4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAdonis Salinas / Michael Elander vs Brian Foley / Ryan Nagle0-6, 1-6
2025-08-17vs Burkwood 5.5Lost 12
W#1 DoublesElamaran Anbalagan / Douglas Lines vs Michael Jernigan / Brendon Albon6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAnil Naidu / Chad Morris vs Andrew Hylton / Scott Childs1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMarshall Powell / Parker Wirsch vs Andrew Powell / Brandon Malone1-6, 1-6
2025-08-09vs MAC BiddleLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnil Naidu / Douglas Lines vs Jon Carrier / Joseph Gault2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSam Taylor / Michael Elander vs Evan Dodd / Zack Griffith3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesParker Wirsch / Elamaran Anbalagan vs Dan Dennis / Greg Chadwick1-6, 1-6
2025-08-08vs ACAC NaputiWon 21
L#1 DoublesParker Wirsch / Robert Mercurio vs Bradford Rhodes / Gary Berg3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesChad Morris / Michael Elander vs Nima Jadidi / Matthew Bryant7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSam Taylor / Elamaran Anbalagan vs James Croke / Parker Ward6-3, 6-3
2025-07-27vs Avalon-WagnerWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnil Naidu / Chad Morris vs Michael White / Istvan Godri Martis7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesElamaran Anbalagan / Gordon Wisotzki vs Adam Terminella / Joseph Piwowarski6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRobert Mercurio / Sam Taylor vs Kevin Terminella / Roberto Sarmento4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Weekend 5.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.47 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Anil Naidu
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.87
Robert Mercurio
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.72
Elamaran Anbalagan
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
2.69
Douglas Lines
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.67
Gordon Wisotzki
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.46
Chad Morris
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.37
Michael Elander
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Adonis Salinas
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.18
Sam Taylor
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
1.93
Antonio Jones-Stamm
published 2.5
1.90
Parker Wirsch
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Marshall Powell
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Douglas Lines + Anil Naidu033 matchesnot enough data
Douglas Lines + Marshall Powell123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Anil Naidu
8W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
Robert Mercurio
28W–33L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
Elamaran Anbalagan
12W–13L career · 7 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Douglas Lines
14W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
2.69
Gordon Wisotzki
20W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
2.5
Chad Morris
7W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%60%40%
2.46
Michael Elander
3W–15L career · 6 lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
2.37
2.5
Adonis Salinas
1W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sam Taylor
11W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.18
2.5
Antonio Jones-Stamm
4W–22L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.93
Parker Wirsch
3W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.90
Marshall Powell
3W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.