Teams

RC BIGGS

2025 FW Adult 18 & Over League - Men · Saturday 3.5 Men

15 players · average NTRP 3.40 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-05-31vs CCC LEONARDWon 50
W#1 DoublesBen Pigeon / Chris Cagle vs Tate Kale / Ryan Seaver6-0, 6-4
W#1 SinglesWill James vs David North7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMario Olmos / Scott Price vs Ryan Rubenkoenig / Eric Spurgeon6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesWilliam Biggs vs Garrett Podell6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCason Burdett / Ray Rhodes vs Joshua Leonard / David Nolan6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Saturday 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
William Biggs
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.41
Ray Rhodes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Edwin Castaneda
published
3.40
Samuel More
published
3.39
Ben Pigeon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Will James
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.36
Mario Olmos
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Chris Cagle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
MacK Staniford
published
3.20
William Brewer
published
3.13
Charley McCluer
published 3.5
3.05
Paul Schulman
published
2.98
Jeff Bush
published
2.92
Bill Blalock
published 3.5
Cason Burdett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

William Biggs + Chris Cagle7265% games+12.8% vs expected
William Brewer + Ben Pigeon3256% games+7.4% vs expected
Jeff Bush + Mario Olmos4156% gamesnot enough data
William Biggs + William Brewer213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

William Biggs
18W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.50
Ray Rhodes
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%73%26%
3.41
Edwin Castaneda
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
Samuel More
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Ben Pigeon
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%77%22%
3.39
Will James
10W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.37
Mario Olmos
6W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%15%
3.36
3.5
Chris Cagle
15W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
MacK Staniford
3W–10L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
William Brewer
15W–8L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Charley McCluer
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.13
Paul Schulman
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
Jeff Bush
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.98
3.5
Bill Blalock
0W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
2.92
3
Cason Burdett
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.