Teams

TOCC Render-Leach - 55s

2026 Combo Doubles 55 & Over-GC · Women 7.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.67 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-08-04vs BBTC AustinLost 03
L#1 DoublesShari Pol / Charlene Langlinais vs Amanda Letonoff / Edye Austin1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCynthia Render-Leach / Beth Gordin vs Paula Moore / Gwen Urbati4-6, 0-3
L#3 DoublesVona Wawryszczuk / Odile Million vs Kathleen Marlowe / Nancy Storey6-2, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Cynthia Render-Leach
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.44
Sue Battaile
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.37
Lori Dewitt
published
3.27
Penny Westfaul
published
3.25
Odile Million
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.25
Shari Pol
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.17
Beth Gordin
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Vona Wawryszczuk
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.09
Charlene Langlinais
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sue Battaile + Shari Pol271657% games+1.8% vs expected
Cynthia Render-Leach + Shari Pol51243% games−3.0% vs expected
Beth Gordin + Shari Pol4254% games−4.6% vs expected
Beth Gordin + Sue Battaile5256% games−6.5% vs expected
Odile Million + Penny Westfaul3254% gamesnot enough data
Lori Dewitt + Sue Battaile1436% gamesnot enough data
Odile Million + Cynthia Render-Leach044 matchesnot enough data
Beth Gordin + Cynthia Render-Leach224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cynthia Render-Leach
26W–69L career · 1 line in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.54
Sue Battaile
92W–51L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.44
Lori Dewitt
48W–45L career · no lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
3.37
Penny Westfaul
32W–42L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
Odile Million
30W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
Shari Pol
64W–64L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Beth Gordin
52W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.17
Vona Wawryszczuk
11W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Charlene Langlinais
11W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
23%76%<1%
3.09

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.