Teams

APlachco.8.5C-DUR

2026 Eno River Combo 40 & Over · 40 & Over Combo 8.5 Women Eve

12 players · average NTRP 4.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 9 6:30 PM
Garrett Road Tennis Courts
Sep 16 6:30 PM
Hope Valley Country Club
Sep 23 6:30 PM
Garrett Road Tennis Courts
Sep 30 6:30 PM
Hope Valley Country Club
2026-09-02vs VDirschl.40.8.5C-HVCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesCheryl Reid / Valerie Acre vs Emily Tinervin / Sarah Motsinger3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMiranda Harmon / Lynne Davis vs Ashley Freedman / Emily Howell2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBarbara Timinskas / Meghan Howard vs Jennifer Moore / Amanda Lacoff2-6, 1-6
2026-08-26vs VDirschl.40.8.5C-HVCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesCheryl Reid / Heidi Ross vs Leslie Boesch / Meredith Howell1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKatherine Leib / Elizabeth Petree vs Jennifer Moore / Amanda Lacoff2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesBarbara Timinskas / Kristen Howering vs Mollie Williams / Abigail Presson3-6, 2-6
2026-08-19vs VDirschl.40.8.5C-HVCCLost 02
L#1 DoublesAna Plachco / Heidi Ross vs Leslie Boesch / Stacey Burkert1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLynne Davis / Miranda Harmon vs Ashley Freedman / Amanda Lacoff6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2026-08-12vs VDirschl.40.8.5C-HVCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesCheryl Reid / Heidi Ross vs Emily Tinervin / Sarah Motsinger2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAna Plachco / Valerie Acre vs Mollie Williams / Amanda Lacoff2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLynne Davis / Emily Culbreth vs Laura Loehr / Madeline Liddicoat1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 40 & Over Combo 8.5 Women Eve
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1VDirschl.40.8.5C-HVCC2060228
2APlachco.8.5C-DUR02061268

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.10
Cheryl Reid
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.02
Katherine Leib
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.95
Ana Plachco
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.95
Valerie Acre
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.78
Elizabeth Petree
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
Lynne Davis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.69
Meghan Howard
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.66
Barbara Timinskas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Miranda Harmon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.64
Heidi Ross
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.48
Emily Culbreth
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kristen Howering
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ana Plachco + Barbara Timinskas5850% games−2.0% vs expected
Elizabeth Petree + Katherine Leib213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cheryl Reid
38W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
23%76%<1%
4.10
Katherine Leib
24W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%45%55%
4.02
4.5
Ana Plachco
150W–120L career · 2 lines in 2026
64%36%<1%
3.95
4
Valerie Acre
129W–56L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.95
Elizabeth Petree
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
94%6%<1%
3.78
Lynne Davis
2W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
96%4%<1%
3.76
Meghan Howard
29W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.69
4
Barbara Timinskas
80W–79L career · 2 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.66
Miranda Harmon
21W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.65
Heidi Ross
33W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.64
Emily Culbreth
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
57%43%<1%
3.48
Kristen Howering
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.