Teams

SS-H PURPLE

2024 CTA WOMEN'S SUMMER DAYTIME - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - SUMMER DAYTIME

9 players · average NTRP 3.31 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-08-07vs SKY PINKWon 10
W#1 SinglesJessica Field vs Jessica Dewees6-1, 6-2
2024-07-31vs GCC NAVYWon 10
W#1 DoublesMegan Whelan / Jessica Field vs Michelle Murphy / Tamara Brown6-2, 6-2
2024-07-24vs WC BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesJessica Field / Whitney Baylor vs Allison Murray / Kathryn Cullen1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesErika Troyer / Laura Spitzenberger vs Mary Brady / Kathleen Bisaccia6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2024-07-17vs GAC ORANGEWon 10
W#1 DoublesJessica Field / Abby Weiss vs Rhonda Buder / Lesley Baker6-0, 6-3
2024-07-10vs GNO GREENWon 20
W#1 SinglesTricia Tichota vs Elizabeth A Shields6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesWhitney Baylor / Jessica Field vs Jill Hibbeln / Cheryl Badger7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2024-07-03Won 20
W#1 DoublesTricia Tichota / Erika Troyer vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesWhitney Baylor / Jessica Field vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-06-26vs HW GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesWhitney Baylor / Tricia Tichota vs Kelly Kane / Mary Morris6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - SUMMER DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Maggie Dornseif
published 3.5
3.39
Callie Nowicki
published 3.5
3.30
Megan Whelan
published
3.28
Tricia Tichota
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Abby Weiss
published 3.5
3.13
Maren Plisko
published 3.5
2.96
Jessica Field
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.90
Whitney Baylor
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.83
Erika Troyer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Whitney Baylor + Jessica Field12758% games+5.2% vs expected
Tricia Tichota + Callie Nowicki5160% games+1.4% vs expected
Tricia Tichota + Erika Troyer5265% gamesnot enough data
Erika Troyer + Abby Weiss303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Maggie Dornseif
47W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.45
3.5
Callie Nowicki
22W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.39
Megan Whelan
25W–21L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.30
3.5
Tricia Tichota
60W–34L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Abby Weiss
17W–1L career · type A · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Maren Plisko
55W–26L career · no lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
3.13
3
Jessica Field
106W–58L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Whitney Baylor
78W–60L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Erika Troyer
93W–43L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.