Teams

Vivante Kaplan

2021 LeeCharlotte Adult 18 & Over Spring Weeknight · 3.5 W Tuesday EVE

12 players · average NTRP 3.88 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-06-07vs CCYC McNeelySplit 11
W#1 DoublesRenee Murno / Diane Crews vs Beverly Nugent / Mary Alice Spencer6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesCheryl Domingo vs Theresa Hopkins5-7, 6-7
2021-05-25Won 10
W#2 SinglesCheryl Domingo vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-05-18vs Gateway GentlemanWon 10
W#2 SinglesCheryl Domingo vs Alisha Daines6-1, 6-0
2021-05-11vs LeeChar - FMRC/VerdiLost 01
L#1 DoublesRuth Coburn / Cheryl Domingo vs Deborah Bretton / Allison McLain7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2021-05-04vs Unlimited CottonWon 20
W#1 DoublesDiane DeGurian / Renee Murno vs Holly Leland / Deanne Kyle6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesCheryl Domingo vs Janey Cahill6-4, 6-3
2021-04-27vs Cypress Lake CourtneyWon 10
W#1 DoublesDiane DeGurian / Renee Murno vs Terri Destoppelaire / Elizabeth Gaines6-0, 6-0
2021-04-13vs CCYC McNeelyWon 10
W#1 DoublesDiane DeGurian / Renee Murno vs Victoria Manietta / Donna Hedrick6-2, 6-2
2021-04-06vs Paseo ZimmerWon 10
W#1 DoublesRuth Coburn / Cheryl Domingo vs Janet Choisnet / Pamella Attuso6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 W Tuesday EVE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Diane DeGurian
published 4.5
3.79
Diane Crews
published 4
3.31
Cheryl Domingo
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Barbara Robinson
published 3.5
Jane Kerstetter
published
Janet Kaplan
published
Mae Nelson Stone
published
Patrice Sanasac
published
Renee Murno
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ruth Coburn
published
Susan Theriault
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Renee Murno + Cheryl Domingo7170% gamesnot enough data
Cheryl Domingo + Diane Crews123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Diane DeGurian
8W–10L career · no lines in 2021
1%94%5%
4.29
4
Diane Crews
6W–4L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%5%
3.79
3.5
Cheryl Domingo
104W–57L career · 6 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Barbara Robinson
8W–10L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%5%
3.29
Jane Kerstetter
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Janet Kaplan
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Karenanne Fitzsimmons
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Mae Nelson Stone
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Patrice Sanasac
4W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Renee Murno
78W–48L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Ruth Coburn
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Susan Theriault
2W–8L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.