Teams

B3 CCV Avery

2021 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over Women 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-06-05vs B4 Raintree RowlandSplit 11
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Fraizer / Suzanne Morris vs Lisa Harmon / Xianghong Li6-3, 6-1
L#2 SinglesMelissa Mauck vs Suzanne Spadafora4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-05-22vs B2 James River HS Napier/StewartWon 10
W#3 DoublesJennifer Bencks / Suzanne Morris vs Melissa Stewart / Paige Oostdyk2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-05-15vs B7 MRTC Williams Battery Park 4.0Won 20
W#2 SinglesMelissa Mauck vs Nancy Siems6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAlison Avery / Suzanne Morris vs Rebecca Morgan / Stacey Johnson6-2, 6-2
2021-05-08vs B5 MAC PauleyWon 10
W#3 DoublesHyde Loupassi / Suzanne Morris vs Philathea Cole / Susan Greenspoon6-3, 6-2
2021-04-24vs B1 Salisbury NewmanWon 30
W#2 DoublesAlison Avery / Leemore Burke vs Leigh Gorman / Karen Franks7-5, 6-4
W#2 SinglesMelissa Mauck vs Lauren Cecil6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJennifer Bencks / Suzanne Morris vs Heather Colberg / Sarah Capozello6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSuzanne Morris / Jennifer Bencks vs Donna Mourtzakis / Stacy Gregor6-1, 6-1
2021-04-10vs B5 MAC PauleyWon 20
W#2 SinglesMelissa Mauck vs Katherine McDowell6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSuzanne Morris / Nancy Taylor vs Susanne Nazur / Lisa Pauley6-3, 6-4
2021-04-03vs B1 Salisbury NewmanWon 10
W#3 DoublesLeemore Burke / Elizabeth Fraizer vs Pat Holland / Kristin Kim6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.14
Kirkland Hagerty
published
3.77
Courtney Harper
published 4
3.73
Karen Williamson
published
3.67
Hyde Loupassi
published 4
3.65
Suzanne Morris
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.64
Alison Avery
published 4
3.61
Leemore Burke
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.42
Melissa Mauck
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.32
Nancy Taylor
published
Susan Trigg
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Mauck + Leemore Burke3350% gamesnot enough data
Alison Avery + Leemore Burke213 matchesnot enough data
Courtney Harper + Karen Williamson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kirkland Hagerty
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
4.14
4
Courtney Harper
8W–3L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
Karen Williamson
7W–6L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Hyde Loupassi
3W–3L career · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.67
Suzanne Morris
27W–8L career · 7 lines in 2021
13%86%<1%
3.65
4
Alison Avery
16W–13L career · no lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
3.64
4
Leemore Burke
54W–67L career · 8 lines in 2021
19%80%<1%
3.61
Melissa Mauck
69W–76L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%73%27%
3.42
Nancy Taylor
0W–6L career · no lines in 2021
91%9%<1%
3.32
Susan Trigg
3W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.