Teams

LCTA39/DANIEL/MPR

2022 LCTA 39 & Over Fall League · 39 & over Fall - Women - 4.0 Day

12 players · average NTRP 3.93 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-03-11Won 20
W#1 DoublesCassandra Andrus / Allie Wurzel vs Ellen Smith / Cheryl Schuldt6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBianca Jardin / Viktoria Payne vs Kim Davis / Kathy Orr6-2, 6-2
2024-02-19vs LCTA39/Estes/DICWon 20
W#1 DoublesEmily Hyder / Cassandra Andrus vs Grayson Potts / Kerrie Scott6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesTina Reid / Viktoria Payne vs Jana Estes / Kimberly Arthurs7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 39 & over Fall - Women - 4.0 Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Viktoria Payne
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.90
Christy Jervey
published 4
3.77
Anita Ainsworth
published 4
Allie Wurzel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Emily Hyder
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Christa Struk
published 4
3.72
Shari Sebuck
published
3.71
Kerrie Scott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Cassandra Andrus
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.53
Roberta Donaldson
published
3.32
Crystal Daniel
published 3.5
Louann Kelly
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Viktoria Payne + Cassandra Andrus9651% games+1.4% vs expected
Kerrie Scott + Christa Struk4456% games−1.3% vs expected
Louann Kelly + Cassandra Andrus1438% games−16.3% vs expected
Allie Wurzel + Christy Jervey4153% gamesnot enough data
Anita Ainsworth + Viktoria Payne314 matchesnot enough data
Louann Kelly + Viktoria Payne033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Viktoria Payne
75W–49L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%75%24%
3.91
4
Christy Jervey
7W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.90
4
Anita Ainsworth
34W–17L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Allie Wurzel
18W–24L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
4
Emily Hyder
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
4
Christa Struk
45W–24L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Shari Sebuck
15W–8L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.72
Kerrie Scott
26W–25L career · 1 line in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Cassandra Andrus
56W–45L career · 2 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Roberta Donaldson
20W–33L career · no lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
3.53
3.5
Crystal Daniel
64W–29L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
Louann Kelly
12W–25L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.