Teams

BBTL (A) 4.0-3.0W 55 & Over (Vaughn)

Tri-Level 55 & Over · Adult Women - 3.0, 3.5, 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · Adult Women - 3.0, 3.5, 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BBTL (A) 4.0-3.0W 55 & Over (Vaughn)000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Robin Bare
published
3.65
Jessica Vaughan
published
3.64
Dunja Sypher
published 4
3.44
Kimberly Bernlohr
published
3.42
Cynthia Rapp
published 3.5
3.27
Kim Spehr
published
3.27
Cindi Crane
published 3.5
3.25
2.65
Linda Quirk
published
2.62
Kathleen Trice
published
2.58
Carolyn Fluharty
published 3
Tracey Ryan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessica Vaughan + Robin Bare7164% games+11.5% vs expected
Kimberly Bernlohr + Dunja Sypher224 matchesnot enough data
Dunja Sypher + Jessica Vaughan134 matchesnot enough data
Dunja Sypher + Cynthia Rapp213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robin Bare
32W–20L career · no lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.94
Jessica Vaughan
41W–49L career · no lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Dunja Sypher
14W–25L career · type A · no lines in 2026
13%86%<1%
3.64
Kimberly Bernlohr
17W–12L career · no lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
3.44
3.5
Cynthia Rapp
36W–30L career · no lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.42
Kim Spehr
11W–22L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Cindi Crane
23W–32L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Brooklyn Graham Kennedy
18W–18L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
Linda Quirk
9W–18L career · no lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
2.65
Kathleen Trice
12W–15L career · no lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
2.62
3
Carolyn Fluharty
10W–21L career · no lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
2.58
Tracey Ryan
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.