Teams

PC-Kirkham

2025 Mixed 18 & Over · 9.0

3 players · average NTRP 4.33 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Maggie Fiocchi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 5
3.79
JENNIFER BELOY
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Robbie Fiocchi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Results4 ties
2024-10-13Split 11
W#1 DoublesTrent Prussing / JENNIFER BELOY vs David Robin / Erica Lee2-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRobbie Fiocchi / Maggie Fiocchi vs Kasey Knox Wilberding / Scott Anderson6-1, 6-0
2024-10-13Split 11
W#1 DoublesTrent Prussing / JENNIFER BELOY vs Rebecca Stewart Rust / Cory Bemis6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRobbie Fiocchi / Maggie Fiocchi vs Alexis Maison / Wally Morrison6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2024-10-12Lost 02
L#2 DoublesTrent Prussing / JENNIFER BELOY vs Tom Griner / Jenny Adams7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRobbie Fiocchi / Maggie Fiocchi vs Scott Anderson / Kasey Knox Wilberding6-3, 6-2
2024-10-12Lost 01
L#3 DoublesRobbie Fiocchi / Maggie Fiocchi vs Cory Bemis / Kristin Larson6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

5
Maggie Fiocchi
4W–19L career
not enough data
4
JENNIFER BELOY
100W–45L career
0%99%1%
3.79
4
Robbie Fiocchi
15W–19L career · type M
not enough data

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.