Teams

Cooper/Memphis

2022 Adult 18 & Over -Memphis · 4.0 Men 18 & over

14 players · average NTRP 3.83 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-05-26vs Hoehn/MemphisLost 01
L#1 DoublesNick Gilder / John Heard vs Robert Hoehn / Gary Clancy3-6, 4-6
2022-05-17Won 10
W#1 DoublesJohn Heard / Nick Gilder vs Taylor Long / Stephen Lewis6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-05-01vs Overstreet/MemphisWon 10
W#1 DoublesNick Gilder / Cory Heinkel vs Bin Li / Xuezhong Li7-6, 6-4
2022-04-03vs Hoehn/MemphisLost 01
L#3 DoublesJerry Vaughn / Nick Gilder vs Timothy Myrick / Paul Woods2-6, 0-6
2022-02-27vs Thomas/MemphisWon 10
W#2 DoublesJerry Vaughn / Nick Gilder vs Josh Thomas / Hunter Ivy6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men 18 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Jon Nestler
published
3.98
Tyler Darby
published
3.88
Jerry Vaughn
published
3.88
Nick Gilder
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.87
Daniel Murdoch
published 4
3.85
Cory Heinkel
published 4
3.83
Jerry Mosley
published
3.80
David Kam
published 4
3.59
Matthew Gregg
published
3.50
ROBERT LEBLANC
published
3.39
John Heard
published
Garth Webster
published 3.5
3.21
Darrell Nephew
published 3.5
Joe Trout
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Kam + John Heard123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jon Nestler
9W–14L career · no lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
4.05
Tyler Darby
32W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%55%45%
3.98
Jerry Vaughn
54W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%17%
3.88
4
Nick Gilder
111W–89L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%82%17%
3.88
4
Daniel Murdoch
41W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Cory Heinkel
16W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.85
Jerry Mosley
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
90%10%<1%
3.83
4
David Kam
32W–32L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
Matthew Gregg
16W–20L career · no lines in 2022
24%75%<1%
3.59
ROBERT LEBLANC
23W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%49%51%
3.50
John Heard
27W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Garth Webster
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Darrell Nephew
15W–34L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
Joe Trout
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.